why 8 hrs?

Associate
Joined
4 Apr 2008
Posts
166
Why 8hrs for prime? why is 8hrs the magic number?

And can you stress your pc more by running prime and calcs of super pi at 32m at the same time?

Would this load it even harder??

Cheers
 
no idea why it is 8 hours... I am guess because thats around 1 cycle of prime small ffts at a lowish clock.. as long as it passes a cycle I would say thats fine..

If you really want to stress then I would run Intel Burn Test and then follow it up with F@H or something similar..
 
For me, 12 hrs is the magic number ;) It is a matter of personal choice.
Preceded by some runs of IntelBurnTester (only runs if you have an Intel CPU....)
 
You guys are ace!

Ran that tool and it passed everytime @3.4ghz on my q6600 fails at 3.5ghz
so now i'm happy that i'm stable.

not going to try to push it any further not risking voltages etc, as for temps...
3.5 got to 67 peak on a small water cooling setup and 61c @ 3.4 so it's all lovely :) prime would hit 50c so it def hits it harder.

Thanks guys
 
i get 3.8ghz, and not change any settings from 3.6ghz, prime fails within 1 minute but i can run everything else without any crashes at any time..

i only bother with 1 hour of prime, if it doesnt crash, its not going to 99% of the time
 
You guys are ace!

Ran that tool and it passed everytime @3.4ghz on my q6600 fails at 3.5ghz
so now i'm happy that i'm stable.

not going to try to push it any further not risking voltages etc, as for temps...
3.5 got to 67 peak on a small water cooling setup and 61c @ 3.4 so it's all lovely :) prime would hit 50c so it def hits it harder.

Thanks guys


Other people here, and myself, will tell you that IB cannot be trusted as a stability tester. I used it, my system passed, only to fail after a Prime95 test. Don't use it any more.
 
Other people here, and myself, will tell you that IB cannot be trusted as a stability tester. I used it, my system passed, only to fail after a Prime95 test. Don't use it any more.

I use IB first and then follow up with Prime95.
IB just saves time in the whole process by picking up errors very quickly - my brief experience anyway. I wouldn't rely on it by itself
 
Back
Top Bottom