• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Why are 939 X2's more expensive than AM2's

saguy

saguy

saguy

Associate
Joined
8 Jul 2005
Posts
1,407
I am still using a 64 3200+ which I was hoping to upgrade to a 64 X2 4200+ AM2, but I have seemed to have missed the boat. There is a £40 price difference between socket 939 and AM2. I recon I will just go for a 64 3700+ San Diego which is only £23.49 and should overclock allot better than my early Winchester core. Let’s face it dual core support for gaming is almost non existent and I will have to see it to believe it.
 
Will_3rd said:
supply and demand
Click to expand...
I have just ordered the 64 3700+ San Diego for £25 which by all accounts is a great overclocker. When my system no longer performs in games only then will I do the big and costly platform upgrade.
 
dante6491 said:
my 3700+ is at 3ghz stable 1.475 volts :)
Click to expand...
nice - i will get mine tomorrow. Its been over a year since I have been into my bios so I will have to remember how it all works again. What are you using for cooling?
 
I see the price has just gone up on OcUk to £44.64. I got mine 2 days ago at £25.00

I have just overclocked it to 2.7 without any testing and its booted into windows no probs. So here goes.
 
I went straight in without any messing around whacked it up to 2700 and it worked first time no probs. I will now increase this overclock knowing that it is now 100% stable. So much easier to overclock than the early Winchesters.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom