• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Why did I wait :(

Status
Not open for further replies.
Associate
Joined
13 Jul 2009
Posts
527
In hindsight i really regret not buying a GTX 680 straight away. At the time i decided it wasen't enough of an improvement over my gtx580 & would wait for the GTX780. If I knew over a year later that the nvidia graphics line would be in such a state I wouldn't of bothered waiting & just paid for that GTX680 on day 1.

Right now dual cards have jumped from the £500-600 area to an eye watering £800+ area. Gone are the days of 4870x2 for sub £400. We also have a new highest price ever for single gpu cards (excluding asus mars cards) in the form of Titan. This (unquestionably fast) card set a new benchmark for seeing quite how much people are prepared to spend on a single gpu.

With enough people willing to shed the cash nvidia brought out the GTX 780 for the usual £400-450....i mean new rip off/recession proof £550. In comparison to Titan its a steal, & this is what nvidia will tell people, but lets get realistic, compared to gtx770/7970 its ridiculously expensive & doesnt justify the new price tag.

The GTX 780 should have been the new series with the usual 15%+ improvement for the same price as the previous gens i.e. £400-440. Instead as Titan laid the groundworks for higher price points nvidia pounced on this. And so they come out at £550. 20% improvement or so for basically 75% more price. The GTX8800/R9700pro etc had bigger performance gains over previous gens without seeing the need for such premium. Nvidia must be loling hard.

The overpriced GTX680 gets rebadged to the GTX770. Nvidia hoping to fool some people? This should have been the GTX680 boost or pro or ultra or even GX685, it doesnt warrant GTX770 name. Yes it did the right thing of bringing a slightly faster version at a cheaper price but this "cheaper price" is what it should cost, its what it should have cost when the 7970GHZ went down to the £325 mark. Its Wwaaaayyy overdue. Its taken the best part of 10 months to bring the price down to level the 7970ghz.

Then theres the pricing of the older cards now. Another mess. So we have the GTX 680 at £330+ area? Hang on the GTX770 can be had for cheaper than this! We have the GTX670 at (with the exception of overclockers) the best part of £280+, again the GTX770 can be found for £293 (on certain other reputable site). And the GTX660ti which is more expensive than the GTX760. So basically the GTX680/670/660ti are all now stupidly priced. They are now pointless cards unless they drop in price, & im not buying the whole "its good for people wanting sli", you're getting overcharged.

We have the GTX770 released with 3rd party coolers because supposidly the Titan cooler costs more? Rubbish!. If this is true then why is it the GTX780 3rd party cooler designs cost more than the Titan cooler ones??? Further to this look at the Gigabyte GTX770 windforce, this card has the same 3x cooler
as the GTX780 3x cooler yet it is one of the cheapest GTX 770 prices going. How is this possible? Either the Titan cooler doesnt cost any extra or its clear that nvidia or retailers are ripping a new one. I guess because all the brands are releasing overclocked/3rd party cooler GTX770s they are not bothering to really charge a premium (rip off) price, whilst on the GTX780 gigabyte & EVGA with their "Cheaper" coolers are charging more compared to the "Expensive" stock titan cooler...hhhmmmm must be the overclocks. The same overclocks
which appear free on the gtx770 variety.

And again one has to wonder why the GTX780 gigabyte & EVGA cards commands premiums of £50+ in this country yet in the states its like 10$ (EVGA GTX780 ACX). Get the **** out! Thankfully as of today i notice one particular site has dropped their gigabyte 780 to £535 area. Still, as per the GTX770, if the titan cooler costs so much can you drop it further gigabyte/retailers?, after all, you're saving money using your own cooler...arent you??? Make up your minds.

Have to give credit to AMD for working with their drivers, dropping their prices, bundling games. Its a pity that as per the issue with the gtx680, I just don't feel the performance boost is quite there coming from a gtx580, especially as Ive waited so long i dont feel like cracking now but man the itch is bad. My only complaint is I wish AMD would at least hint
at what to expect from their next card, so that for us people sitting on the fence we can decide whether to just give up & buy whats available or wait. If they came out & just said "Expect GTX780 beating performance at a more reasonable price" then that would be enough to convince me to wait longer but I would hate to wait yet a further 3 months + for AMD to just do an nvidia & release another next gen card with a okish performance increase at a new higher stupid price going "Well they did it!".

Im a pc gamer, fps all the way for me. But can't say im impressed right now with these gpus. I have the money to buy a GTX780 right now & would love one but i refuse to pay the price that nvidia is milking. Its like ****ing cinema popcorn, we would all happily pay a bit of a premium but it gets to a stage when you just have to say "seriously? No!". Feels like their trying to drive people away to consoles. Sulk over, had to let off steam, its only my silly opinion. Apologies about the grammer. Feel free to mock away :).
 
Last edited:
Well I certainly cant fault you for expressing your opinion man.

I too feel that this round is taking the **** somewhat but ultimately, we have no idea whats going on behind closed doors.

I really think that another GPU manufacturer entering the market right now would be a great thing!
 
I have been saying the same for months since the titan was released, But i got shot down by moppets trying to justify their purchases.
 
agreed, i have a 680, i want another, for no reason really... i just want one... i keep looking at the prices though and just think... yup... still overpriced, especially when i need to buy a water block for it also, and fittings, takes me to 450 quid again!!
 
Glad I bought a 680 on day 1 for £385 :D

My only regret is for AMD, if they had clocked the 7970 at what it was obviously capable of at launch I would have bought one of them instead.


To be fair highest single GPU prices have typically always been around £500, you look back at the 8800GTX, x1900/1800s etc, sometimes things are better the 4870x2 as you say and the 5870. I wouldn't look at the Titan as indicative pricing, it's not a consumer card.

The worrying thing though is the price of multi GPU cards which for some reason seems to have moved from the previous norm of single card +50% to more than double the single card price.
 
Last edited:
The difference is now that second tier cards are so much cheaper but have very good performance.

OP just get 2 x 760s and be done with it :p
 
Glad I bought a 680 on day 1 for £385 :D

My only regret is for AMD, if they had clocked the 7970 at what it was obviously capable of at launch I would have bought one of them instead.


To be fair highest single GPU prices have typically always been around £500, you look back at the 8800GTX, x1900/1800s etc, sometimes things are better the 4870x2 as you say and the 5870. I wouldn't look at the Titan as indicative pricing, it's not a consumer card.

The worrying thing though is the price of multi GPU cards which for some reason seems to have moved from the previous norm of single card +50% to more than double the single card price.
True the price for single GPU graphic card had hit £500+ before, but cards such as the 8800GTX had a huge performance jump over the previous gen fastest card (x1800/x1900) by nearly 100%. The biggest problem with the GTX780 is not its high price, but the lack of equivalent performance increase over the the 7970/GTX680 (a pitiful average of 15-40% increase depended on the game) to justify the price premium.

Anyway to be honest though, I don't think AMD's next gen card would be coming in as good value as we all hope it to be, based on their latest attempt with their pricing on the FX9590 CPU...

Looks like their are out for blood (or money) :P
 
Last edited:
Pretty much spot on with that rant.

I had been looking to upgrade my 480 and had been waiting for the 7XX cards planning to buy one (preferably the 780). After finding out the price of the 780 and that the 770 was just a rebadged 680, I picked up a second hand 680 instead :)
 
Well, big kudos to AMD at the moment for their pricing and free game codes

They just need to bring out their Volcanic Island series, to compete with Nvidia's headliners
 
The difference is now that second tier cards are so much cheaper but have very good performance.

OP just get 2 x 760s and be done with it :p

I've done SLI & crossfire & prefer my single cards. Problem is I feel the GTX 680 & 7970 wasent worth the jump when they came out. So I've waited another year & a bit for the GTX780 to then be told i need to cough up £550 for something I was expecting would land at £450. If they want £550 (when gtx770/7970 is £300ish) then it should be offering 50%+ improvement on the previous cards, not 15-30%.

Having waited this long already I don't want to particularly crack & buy a 15 month old GTX680 or 7970 for about £70 cheaper than it was 15 months ago. Might as well buy something new, but I simply cant pull the trigger on the GTX780 at that price for that performance. And like some have said, especially given the stupid price AMD brought the 7990 out for i.e. cost more than the DEVIL that was brought out earlier for less money (and looked better) go figure?! I got a feeling AMD are also going to be pricing at £500+. Lets just hope they set the performance bar higher.
 
I was very clear in my mind I was going for a launch day 680 purchase. it paid off and was a huge upgrade from my GTX285.

I was in 2 minds about the 7xx series and am glad I skipped it. I will likely wait until I play a title which has outgrown my 680. Like when I upgrade to a 680, GTX285 just did not cut it for BF3.

BF4 will likely run just fine on a 680 so am not sure what the next popular title I will play will be that prompts a GPU upgrade!
 
Nice post. I only recently upgraded from a 4870 to a 7950 (a few months back). The reason being for not upgrading earlier was that the 4870 pretty much played everything I through at it (mass effect, wow etc not very demanding games). Only recently I started playing more demanding games (Tomb Raider etc) so needed the upgrade. I would only ever upgrade the 7950 once the games I play start to struggle on it beyond being playable.
 
You act as though this is all new....yet you have a gtx 580, a card that was given it's own new generation as well, yet was just a slightly clocked and fine tuned gtx 480....at least this time around they haven't called the 770 a 780 and put it back in the original 680 price bracket....

If anything it is amd's lack of competition with the titan / 780 (gk110 gpu) that is causing all this...
 
You act as though this is all new....yet you have a gtx 580, a card that was given it's own new generation as well, yet was just a slightly clocked and fine tuned gtx 480....at least this time around they haven't called the 770 a 780 and put it back in the original 680 price bracket....

If anything it is amd's lack of competition with the titan / 780 (gk110 gpu) that is causing all this...

Yeaa lets all blame AMD for Nvidias pricing :rolleyes:
 
True the price for single GPU graphic card had hit £500+ before, but cards such as the 8800GTX had a huge performance jump over the previous gen fastest card (x1800/x1900) by nearly 100%. The biggest problem with the GTX780 is not its high price, but the lack of equivalent performance increase over the the 7970/GTX680 (a pitiful average of 15-40% increase depended on the game) to justify the price premium.

Ah bear in mind you shouldn't compare performance of refreshes in the same size die process, they will ~always be poor.

The 780 should be compared to the 580. You only get the massive jump in performance over a die shrink so 40nm to 28nm.

Reading between the lines, and looking at Nvidias naming scheme, the true 680 never made it. I suspect just like the 480 Nvidia had problems manufacturing it and unlike the 480 they couldn't chop off the odd smx to make it feasible. Luckily for them their mid range part could be overclocked and match a stock speed 7970.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom