Soldato
- Joined
- 30 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 4,061
- Location
- Inverness (UK)
Hello folks,
Now, since the T-Bred B's, I've always bought the slowest CPU of the current production and clocked it to over the highest available.
(All on air)
So getting an XP2100 T-Bred B up to over 2GHz IIRC.
XP2500-M to 2.38GHz
X2 2800 to 2.66GHz.
Yet I've noticed people buying XP3200's and getting nearly the same speeds. Or X2 4400's and getting the same or lower clocks.
There seems to be a tiny difference between the clockability of the bottom of the range and top of the range CPU's.
(Sorry - had very limited experience with intel)
So why is it people shell out much £££ for the top of the line CPU's that to me, clock exactly the same as the lowest end?
(Ignoring Cache sizes, you would then just buy the lowest end chip with the higher cache size)
I always recommend peeps get the lowest end and put a 'safe/easy' clock on it.
How much of a benefit is there (if any) in getting a top end CPU to clock with?
Thanks.
Now, since the T-Bred B's, I've always bought the slowest CPU of the current production and clocked it to over the highest available.
(All on air)
So getting an XP2100 T-Bred B up to over 2GHz IIRC.
XP2500-M to 2.38GHz
X2 2800 to 2.66GHz.
Yet I've noticed people buying XP3200's and getting nearly the same speeds. Or X2 4400's and getting the same or lower clocks.
There seems to be a tiny difference between the clockability of the bottom of the range and top of the range CPU's.
(Sorry - had very limited experience with intel)
So why is it people shell out much £££ for the top of the line CPU's that to me, clock exactly the same as the lowest end?
(Ignoring Cache sizes, you would then just buy the lowest end chip with the higher cache size)
I always recommend peeps get the lowest end and put a 'safe/easy' clock on it.
How much of a benefit is there (if any) in getting a top end CPU to clock with?
Thanks.