Why England football team under perform?

Associate
Joined
2 Feb 2013
Posts
128
Location
Manchester
All of England players play one of the biggest, high speed and big money league in the world.
All players are individually world class in their own rights, yet every tournament Sami Finals or quarter finals is Achievements according to some of the UK Media.

Do you thing players are psychology damaged by the media, their clubs?
Do you think the pressure of “don’t Screw up” get to them and make them fail?

Why do you think in penalties England players fail to take advantage?


Today for example, the media putting pressure on the team and predicting what the fans would do against Ashley Cole.

Only my opinion!!!
 
I think we are over ranked by FIFA but I think our perfomance in international competitions is about right for the quality of players we have.

I certainly wouldn't say they were world class in every position.

In fact I'd say probably only left back and the two central midfield spots fell into that category.
 
We've got a team full of players that are "above average" but nobody that can really change games alone like a Ronaldo. Most other teams, even the ones that have fewer good players than England do have one. A good example is Ibrahimovic for Sweden.

Teams like Brazil do well because practically every player on the team is capable of pulling something extraordinary out of his arse at any given moment.

The other side of the coin are teams like Italy that do well because they are like England with a decent collection of players but are more resilient and don't bottle it in big games.
 
England don't underperform, they perform to their level ie. last 8.

We only think they underperform because they are massively overhyped.
 
We've had a few stinkers with the likes of McSven and Keegan in recent years but we generally perform as well as a team with the quality of player we have can and usually get knocked out by better teams.

We only underperform in the sense that we don't perform as well as the media say we can before tournaments begin.
 
We're a nation of 53 million people who've been playing football for a long time but who didn't enter international tournaments until quite late. We've won the World Cup once and regularly reach the last 8 of tournaments. We don't under-perform.

Certain other countries, like Germany and Italy, have historically over-performed.
 
We're a nation of 53 million people who've been playing football for a long time but who didn't enter international tournaments until quite late. We've won the World Cup once and regularly reach the last 8 of tournaments. We don't under-perform.

Certain other countries, like Germany and Italy, have historically over-performed.

are you saying team like England Last 8 is enough for 53 Million fans?
 
England don't underperform, they perform to their level ie. last 8.

We only think they underperform because they are massively overhyped.

if their level is last 8 and you know it, why before a big tournament people say "this is England's year"
 
When you say people what you actually mean is the media and brainwashed sheep.

so if the media stop pressuring the team, then maybe perhaps Big Final might be on the cards?

these players are players who are on big money, and we watch them every week and they perform 100%, but not for England.

John terry was asked Champions league with Chelsea or Euro with England?

what was hes answer?
 
All of England players play one of the biggest, high speed and big money league in the world.

None of those things benchmark the players as being good at football, they play in a well supported and rich league. The game is played at a high pace but there are a high majority of players not from England that apply their trade here too.

All players are individually world class in their own rights, yet every tournament Sami Finals or quarter finals is Achievements according to some of the UK Media.

No. The players aren't 'World Class'. Semi finals is a great result for an England team.

Do you thing players are psychology damaged by the media, their clubs?
No.

Do you think the pressure of “don’t Screw up” get to them and make them fail?
I don't think this is the 'major' factor no.

Why do you think in penalties England players fail to take advantage?
I don't know. I think it's a combination of lots of things.

Today for example, the media putting pressure on the team and predicting what the fans would do against Ashley Cole.

Only my opinion!!!
 
Last edited:
[DOD]Asprilla;23702382 said:
Germany: 81m
Brazil: 200m
Italy: 60m
France: 65m
Spain: 47m
Netherlands: 17m

I'd say the Dutch over perform.

It pretty much boils down to how many people you have actively playing the game.

please answer, Are you happy with last 8 every tournament? i am sure is not about the amount of fans, is how players are developed, specially mentally.

England players play against a team,its fans, and the media, and one mistake they are out of the team.
 
are you saying team like England Last 8 is enough for 53 Million fans?

I personally think that would be a good result for England.

if their level is last 8 and you know it, why before a big tournament people say "this is England's year"

I don't say it. It's the English gutter press, build 'em up and knock 'em down. It isn't helped by the lack of football education endemic in this country and the attitude towards football and the style of football, ect

so if the media stop pressuring the team, then maybe perhaps Big Final might be on the cards?

It is going to take more than just the media stopping putting so much pressure on England for them to be succesful.

these players are players who are on big money, and we watch them every week and they perform 100%, but not for England.

What a player earns is irrelevant.

What do you mean by 'perform', do you mean they give less commitment and less effort in for England? Do you mean they just don't play as well for England?

John terry was asked Champions league with Chelsea or Euro with England?

what was hes answer?

Quite frankly what that man thinks is irrelevant. He is no longer part of the England set up and is on borrowed time at club level (imho).
 
please answer, Are you happy with last 8 every tournament? i am sure is not about the amount of fans, is how players are developed, specially mentally.

England players play against a team,its fans, and the media, and one mistake they are out of the team.

Yes, I'm happy with last 8, it's about the right level.

Look at any sport and you'll see that success is generally linked to two factors; uncovering talent in your population and the amount of money your put into developing that talent.

Brazil has a huge population and football doesn't have much in the way of competition for athletic outlet.

The UK has a reasonable population but with a diverse range of professional and amateur sporting options. The money put into football coaching is pretty good though.
 
I think that they do give 100%, but they just quite often aren't as good a footballers as they are made out to be.
 
First we don't have world class players throughout the team, second, not a single manager has used an appropriate formation and tactics in the past 12-16 years, we pick the most popular players at the top 6 clubs followed by the highest paid of the rest to make the big clubs feel better about overpaying crap like Barry.

Every England manager in the past 16 years has been a yes man that picks who the FA tell them is most valuable in advertising rights to pick, nothing more or less.

Players psychologically damaged by their own clubs and the media, yes they are. Look at Walcott after he has a truly terrible game but Arsenal win, or the same for England, he's suddenly talking about winning titles, if he scores in a game Arsenal or England lose, he starts talking about how the team needs to do better, like he's some footballing god who has made it to the top.

We have players who are convinced, largely by their 100k a week pay packets, that they ARE the best players in the world and very few of them try and improve, for me guys like Walcott have this "I'm the best I can be, therefore why would I try harder" attitude, and this seems both, very English, common amongst the worse players that get picked and something that seems to be given to them by the treatment footballers get. Managers who don't drop crap players, fans who ignore bad performances, FA who push an agenda of playing those deemed most valuable rather than whoever is best for the team.

Everything, I mean EVERYTHING about the England set up is wrong, players, coaching, FA involvement, the managers they pick and the attitude of the media.

Rooney isn't a playmaker, Heskey should never have gotten anywhere near the team, Welbeck is complete cack, Walcott is rubbish, Johnson can't defend, a midfielder who specialises in defence is rarely used for England, Parker being the first in ages and we looked vastly better when he played... Barry doesn't count as he can't defend and is one of the slowest footballers in England who can't compete at the top level at all... as evident by being at massive fault for most of Englands worst performances(as is Johnson).

Wilshire, Parker, Lampard is the best central midfield we'd put out in donkeys years, defence, strength, intelligence, passing, discipline, quality going forward. Gerrard and Barry aren't substitutes for those two.

Picking form players from "lesser" teams makes more sense than picking out of form big club players who do nothing for England, giving guys like Lambert call ups, rather than repeatedly picking people who underperform, is yet another way to tell an underperforming player he doesn't have to try harder because he won't be dropped no matter how bad he gets.
 
Back
Top Bottom