I have 1gb of ram for a start...
I'm using a (£400 at the time) laptop![]()
horses for courses really, chose software to hit your hardware or vis versa depending on which is necessary.
Vista isn't meant to run on such old/limited hardware.
I have 1gb of ram for a start...
I'm using a (£400 at the time) laptop![]()
Can you run Office <2007 in Vista? Not tried.
I'm a linux user. I can't stand the user experience with MS products and MS's attitude to its users.![]()
what's that got to do with the price of chips?
I never said you couldn't :/
Ok I know you've quoted me but you seem to be replying to somthing entirely different
Rigfht most people don;t need that customisation, and you still havent given more than 1 (very vague) argument against vista or any windows product.
Right, so you'cve managed to post all that and not answer the questions.
You still haven't given a single extra reason why vista is worse.
horses for courses really, chose software to hit your hardware or vis versa depending on which is necessary.
Vista isn't meant to run on such old/limited hardware.
Also, dangerstat, you seem to be preaching why Linux is good. We all know its good at niché roles, what we all wanted to know was:
"What makes Vista BAD?"
Okay so I install Vista right like yourself, and then I try to ssh into my server and FAIL. Okay then I think well actually I need to ssh -X into my server FAIL. Okay I dont want a bloaty front end so I'll use something less bloaty FAIL. Okay no problem Java and Perl will atleast be there by default right FAIL. Okay well I'll just open a a text editor that has some idea about code by default, FAIL. Okay never mind, I'll start working on a word document by default - no wait FAIL it word is expensive.
And it just goes on and on and on and on that way
I tend to find most people that say XP or Vista sucks either have broken hardware, out of date drivers or just generally fail at using the OS.
And any of these tasks impact on an 'average' user is any way how exactly? Sure, if you're a coder or you've got specific requirements then Vista isn't necessarily the best OS out the box but it is very adaptable, relatively stable, doesn't require much (any) technical knowledge to start using and has a vast array of software coded for it (let's not go overboard but a rough estimate of 75% of the Worlds software being available in a Windows variant doesn't seem unlikely).
And any of these tasks impact on an 'average' user is any way how exactly? Sure, if you're a coder or you've got specific requirements then Vista isn't necessarily the best OS out the box but it is very adaptable, relatively stable, doesn't require much (any) technical knowledge to start using and has a vast array of software coded for it (let's not go overboard but a rough estimate of 75% of the Worlds software being available in a Windows variant doesn't seem unlikely).
When I purchase a laptop to simply work out of the box(Auto updates are meant to be on) I expect it to perform flawlessly. I can't be bothered to be dealing with driver errors and BSOD'S.
whilst on the subject, anyone else prefer office 2003 to 2007? the menus just seem easier to use..
No not at all but, but to be honest if your posting on an overclocking forum then your not an average user..
But you'd more than likely be a gamer, as that's why most people here have high specs, and oc'ed parts.
Lookswise... initially didn't like it as reminded me of Mac OS.
BB x