Why is 10 Gb Ethernet still so expensive?

Soldato
Joined
1 Apr 2014
Posts
19,073
Location
Aberdeen
Gigabit Ethernet has been ubiquitous for a decade, so why is 10 Gb Ethernet still so expensive? Is it a matter of patents? Or is gigabit seen as 'good enough'? Or something else?
 
So to do 10G between two machines is £30ish for a pair of cards and a cable, if you want a switch, budget £100 ish for a new Mikrotik,

Those are auction-site prices, not OCUK, right? But I think you're underestimating the home environment. Take the example of two professional adults at home with a WSE 2016 box or NAS elsewhere in the house backing up their PCs and handling WSUS, as well as central file storage.

Even my own home setup here requires three switches.
 
Your ‘professional person’ comment comment is just baffling, do ‘professional persons’ have a few PB of high speed NVMe and appropriate workstation/server set-up’s then yes,

Don't be silly. For example, my brother works on Excel spreadsheets that run into the tens of gigabytes; the largest suite was over 100 GB. Even with gigabit ethernet those take a LONG time to transfer; with 10 gigabit, the time is reduced significantly.
 
Ignoring that for a moment, it seems unlikely he has a data set like that of his personal stamp collection, so i’ll suggest he is working on a commercial basis, GDPR/ISO certification/legality/insurance/good practice would suggest he is unlikely to be backing up commercial works to a personally owned consumer NAS on his hone network, as that’s just a horrible scenario, but ignoring all of that...

He isn't right now because he doesn't have 10 GbE. He uses an external USB 3.1 drive.
 
So neither you nor your brother have had or currently do use 10Gb in the home environment or aware of the minimal costs.

So I'll bite! Why don't you spec up a 10 Gb Ethernet network for four people? Two adults and two children. Everyone has their own PC, the adults in a shared study and the children in their bedrooms, and there's a HP Microserver. The server is distant from the PCs but local to the internet router. From the internet router to the study is 30m and the bedrooms require an additional 10m or so each from the study. There's also a printer in the study with a gigabit port to be connected to the LAN. All kit is to be brand new.

Put up.
 
Perhaps because you’ve supplied an illogical/fictional set of circumstances in an attempt to justify a position that has already been discredited in previous posts by myself and others?

Actually, it's a combination of two real scenarios. So you can take your 'discredited' and discredit it.

Home user demand for 10Gb is virtually nonexistent,

I bet they said that about gigabit ethernet too. You'll note that high-bandwidth wifi routers are increasingly popular as long as they're cheap. Speed sells, but the price has to be affordable.

So please, get off your high horse and ignore why someone might want it and try to answer the question of why 10 GbE is still so expensive in the first place.
 
As someone who grew up using ser/parnet and dial-up BBS’ with a 2400bps modem

I started on 300 bps and 1200/75. I tapped 5 Mb thick ethernet. I strung 10 Mb ethernet BNC cables. So, please don't try that with me. I've seen networking go through several life cycles. We're more than overdue for 10 Gb to migrate from the datacentre to ubiquity.

The very same post you cherry picked from clearly stated ‘home user demand for 10Gb is virtually nonexistent’.

If it were cheap there would be demand.
 
Or something homebuilt for a lot less money:

CASE

SST-CS381B (https://www.silverstonetek.com/product.php?pid=861&area=en) £299.99

That's lovely.


I think a better choice would be this board. Okay, it's X470, not X570, but it has IPMI and onboard dual 10 Gb ethernet and auto-splits the x16 slots. Or this Epyc board.


You might also consider this build instead:

 
Back
Top Bottom