Wii: Manhunt 2 - Withdrawn

manoz said:
Nah, I just think the industry needs to be maturer and these games ain't helping. I'm tired of fanboyism(also)

Not wishing to be argumentative or anything, but what do you mean about the fanboyism remarks? The game was due out on all 3 major consoles. What is so fanboyism about the game been banned for all 3? I'm confused :confused:
 
M0t0r0la said:
Good! I personally don't want kids playing vile games like this tbh and before people say it's going to have an 18 rating we all know kids can and will either download it or get their hands on a copy somehow.
It's also not the same as a violent movie, this is interactive which in my opinion makes it far more dangerous.

True!

However, there is a way out which would benefit the 'sane', 'sensible' and members/gamers out there that wish to play this game and are adult enough to know it's a game.

The bottom line, which a lot of people will find hard to accept, is that you are (were) purchasing something that is a computer game. A mutated form of a collection of pixels and sound that has taken 20 years to go from PacMan (hunting things in a maze and killing them - heaven forbid!!) to something that essentially had you playing the role of someone fighting to survive. Yes the graphics are more 'advanced' (mature if you wish) yes the sound is enhanced (blood curdling squeels rather than a bip-bap-bop).

But let's be adult over this. You can go to video stores and purchase "Debbie Does Dallas" or "Gangbang in Bangcock". Even those videos covers have yellow stars covering nipples and the like, but the casual observer who has no interest still can't avoid cleavage, thighs and buttocks unless they deliberately look away.

So along comes a game. It's violent (a lot are), it's got sound strong language (a lot do), the nature is somewhat questionable (I still giggle like a school girl when I think about chasing whores with a pink ***** in San Andreas!) and it's got blood (golly gosh!).

So why can't this game be allowed, but ONLY through mail order? It'll NEVER appear on the shelves, so 'kids' won't be able to get it or some questionable game shop sell it. If it's mail order then it can only be purchased by someone with a credit card. Credit card companies can perform an age verification so even a 17 year old wouldn't be able to buy it.

That way the game can still be purchased but only through a controlled environment.

I just don't see the issue with them banning it. Apart from a snuff movie and/or paedophillia, I have a right (or should have) to see anything/play anything on my PC. It's ludicrous.
 
PiKe said:
You have to recognise there is a difference between being an onlooker (watching a film) and participating (by playing a game) though.

Interesting point. I agree.

However, what's different between watching a boxing game, playing a boxing game and beating the hell out of someone? Boxing games have been around for years, but AGAIN, the Wii has provided a more interactive experience.

Is a highschool fight between kids going to get attributed to something the 'kids' picked up from Wii Sports.

It's either a blanket ban or no ban in my eyes, no inbetween.
 
Weebull said:
But by the same token, why don't actual boxers go around punching the crap out of everybody? I mean, they're not just doing it in a game, they're doing it for real.

I honestly can't tell if you're defending my argument or not!

To clarify, I'm saying the ban is a bad thing because Wii:Sports has a boxing game in it, a sport which is 'classed' as dangeous/lethal.

Anyway...

What about Resident Evil and the Chain Saw attachment! That was allowed. A chainsaw attachment with splashes of blood, noise effects, vibrating, was MADE to LOOK and FEEL and SOUND like a real chain saw.

I said this on another forum: What about flight sims? Will we see a ban of those shortly in case some lunatic practices a flight on a 737 into a famous landmark. The details of these sims of late are astonishing. People will be able to time a flight from abudakashan to the houses of parliment, calculating time, distance, fuel, etc, etc.

What about Trauma Centre? Why hasn't that been banned then? Surely the 'baffoons' that think computers games are like real life (or a influenced) will be attempting their friends heart by pass after "getting a feel for it" on the game.

There's countless games that even offer you a bonus for a head shot! I mean come on, it's one thing playing Call of Battlefield 3 that reinacts famous battles of the last wars. But a bonus, an achievement, and pat on the back for allowing a bullet to penetrate the skull of johnny foreigner and turning his grimace into tomatoe juice is surely the same thing.

Us gamers can't win, or at least the more adult ones. We complain that we're bored of pretty pink princesses bouncing around with freddie the frog, get bored with ickle baby dinosaur trying to get home to mummykins and avoiding nasty wasty mr toad that goes "gwibbet" (he's got a lisp from the wicked witch). And when we get something a bit more meaty, something that has a tongue in cheek adult theme to it, it's taken away!

We're in a game that we can't win!
 
Email from Rockstar:

“We wanted to thank everyone who has taken the time to contact us about Manhunt 2, which we had been planning to release on PlayStation 2, PSP and Nintendo Wii. As you know, Manhunt 2 was effectively banned around much of the world, after it was refused certification in the United Kingdom, prohibited in Ireland, and denied an M rating in the United States.

We are very proud of Manhunt 2 and believe it builds on what the team accomplished with the first title in the series. The game was developed as a horror experience, and to be an M rated title, aligning it with similar horror content created in other forms of media. Unlike many other people, we do not think video games should be singled out for special treatment from the authorities. We hope to have more information for you soon, but in the meantime, we wanted you to know how much we value all of your messages of support.”

http://www.strategyinformer.com/member/3/blog/3667
 
Back
Top Bottom