Will bad company 2 nerf bf3

Soldato
Joined
24 Aug 2006
Posts
10,114
Location
Gibraltar
Having played and like bfbc2 i can not help but think that bf3 will lose the openness of the maps. These maps are just to small for bf game. Those who like and play the bf games, what do you think?
 
The maps are small? Hmm, I might actually look into playing it then. I absolutely despise the usual Battlefield gameplay with 400 snipers sitting on hills a million miles away from me.
 
Dice has said they prefer the streamlined rush/conquest maps of BC2 to the open maps of old. Make of that as you will.

Personally I think the maps in BC2 are a step beyond anything in 2/2142. They may be smaller but they are so much better designed to concentrate the gameplay and give a kick-ass experience. BC2 is a pretty amazing game.
 
Hm, i would have liked them a bit bigger to be honest

Be nice to have Bad company 2 style gameplay but with fighters/bombers and 64 player online.
 
bf2 is awesome.
aimbot is very annoying and so are the overpowered planes and grenades on infantry only.
i think bf2 is holding up well for its age.

bad company is good but different, but i just know bf3 on pc will be bigger and better by a mile.
 
Last edited:
Rush, conquest, squads stuff is all very nice mixes it up etc but they should have added a mode something like 'war', no objectives just destroy enemy, 2 teams against each other either side of map and just have a massive frontline of fighting, 64 players, 1 hour battles etc would have been awesome

Rush is similar but you have to concentrate on objectives and respawns run out quick
 
Big maps for me please, I like the vastness of BF2, it gives old players like me a chance to work out what the hell is going on too! :)
 
The big maps are only good if you have a high player count, right now the bc2 maps are the perfect size for the amount of player it has, now when dice comes to map bf3 and i guess that at the min it will have to be 64 players then the map design will reflex this, so no i dont think it will be nerfed
 
BF3 better have big maps or like BC2 I wont be wasting my money on it. Still I doubt Dice/EA will care there are hordes of console fodder out there sadly.
 
BF3 won't have small maps compared to this, if they do then I doubt their will be jets.

This is just a spin off series, I don't think it should have been Battlefield though, just Bad company */2.

BF3 imo will be massive in comparison to BF2.
 
BF3 won't have small maps compared to this, if they do then I doubt their will be jets.

This is just a spin off series, I don't think it should have been Battlefield though, just Bad company */2.

BF3 imo will be massive in comparison to BF2.

Agreed. You shouldn't even compare the two.
 
Given that BFBC2 is far superior to BF2, I doubt that 'nerf' will be the word that applies.

Don't think you understood the question. Its about map size not which is a better game. Would love to see the destructable enviroment on bf2 sized maps. What i mean by 'nerf' is that it will kill the style bf1942,2 and 2142 have.
 
I have trouble calling BFBC2 an actual battlefield game. I like it but the maps are too small. Its like fighting in a corridor with two choke points so its hard to apply strategy. The maps feel smaller than MW.
Hopefully BF3 will have the look of BC2 and the scale of 1942 but I doubt it, BC2 has changed the franchise for good and possibly not for the better.
 
If BF3 ever comes out its likely to be 64 + player... meaning huge maps.... BF3 will come at some point. I would have thought it will stay true to BF2 and have all the goodness BF2 had.... I.e Jets, huge maps, 64+ players, sandbox, more server options, most custom etc etc.... personally i think all these titles BF are releasing are a way to test the market and make BF3 the biggest game on all platforms...

Think about it, if they released bf3 now they'd have huge interest... However by releasing BC2, heroes, 1943 etc it gets people more interested across the platform ready for the main title BF3...
 
Back
Top Bottom