• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Will Ryzen 4000 CPUs have more PCIE lanes?

Soldato
Joined
1 Apr 2014
Posts
19,181
Location
Aberdeen
Right now Ryzen 3000 CPUs support 24 PCIE lanes - 16 for the GPU, 4 for a NVME drive, and 4 for everything else. That seems too low for for the enthusiast sector, so I'm wondering if the Ryzen 4000 CPUs will support more? A boost to 36 (16 for the GPU, 8 for two NVME drives, 4 for 10 Gb ethernet, and 8 for everything else) would work wonders. This would still leave Threadripper as the premium HEDT product with 88 (never mind Epyc's 128 lanes). This would also allow better product differentiation with the B650 boards supporting the basic 24 lanes and the X670 boards enabling 36.
 
It’s probably worth keeping in mind that it’s PCI-E Gen 4

Yes. But that can be fully used, as the PS5 demonstrates.

but some current motherboards pretty much offer what you are looking for.

Only the Epyc ones.

What portion of sales do you think Ryzen desktop enthusiast community uses more than 16+4 lanes?

I think it would be pretty high, actually, if they were available. Remember that we're discussing the enthusiast market here, not the ordinary market, for whom I agree 16+4 is sufficient.
 
Also you missed the last bit of my post, which illustrates you can get what you want with tweaked motherboard designs that are already in use by some manufacturers.

Not with the B550 or X570 chipsets, you can't; only Threadripper and Epyc. The RX 5700 is already bandwidth-limited by PCIe3.
 
Thanks, that is good to know. So if your devices were PCI-E 4.0 you could be using only 14x/18x theoretically speaking of course. 8x on a GPU, then 4x/8x on two M.2 SSD's, and 2x on a 10GbE card.


Except that we have PCIe4 NVME drives and PCIe4 GPUs so you cannot halve those numbers.
 
And as other have said, you dont need anymore lanes from the CPU if you buy the right board, X570 comes with 16 full speed PCI-e 4.0 lanes from the chipset along with the ones from the CPU, giving a total of 40.

I thought the second 16 on x570 were from the PCH, not the CPU, and the PCH communicates to the CPU via a x4 link so it's really x4.were
 
The Asus X570 WS Pro-Ace is wired as follows "Three PCIe 4.0 x16 slots with optimized lane arrangement of 3-way x8/x8/x8 to accelerate an increasingly diverse array of workloads"


From the specifications page:

3rd Gen AMD Ryzen™ Processors
2 x PCIe 4.0 x16 (x16 or dual x8)
2nd Gen AMD Ryzen™ Processors
2 x PCIe 3.0 x16 (x16 or dual x8)
2nd and 1st Gen AMD Ryzen™ with Radeon™ Vega Graphics Processors
1 x PCIe 3.0 x16 (x8 mode)
AMD X570 chipset
1 x PCIe 4.0 x16 (x8 mode)
1 x PCIe 4.0 x1

They're bifurcating the x16 GPU slot and using 8 channels from the PCH.
 
Ti's or equivalent professional grade cards, but losing 3-5% performance by using 8x lanes rather than 16x isn't ideal, but is hardly a deal breaker unless you are using it in a mission critical or time sensitive application.

And how much performance do you think the RTX 3000 GPUs will lose? And Sony have shown us the benefits of full PCIE v4 bandwidth with the PS5.
 
We already knew that a 4x 4.0 = 8x 3.0, and we already know that is the same 7.88GB/s maximum theoretical throughput. 'Full' PCI-E 4.0 bandwidth isn't achieved with a 4x slot btw.

It can be after you process the data. You're not streaming straight from the NVME drive to the GPU; you're doing it via the CPU. Processing is involved. Note that Sony did a comparison with PCIe v3 and that fell way behind.
 
Back
Top Bottom