Windows Paint JPEG compression

Associate
Joined
27 Feb 2006
Posts
1,750
Location
Normanton
How do you turn the Jpeg compression off in paint? (or set it so its around 80%)

When i save pictures in paint as jpeg it destroys them


Thanks
 
I don't think you can change the compression level in paintbrush. Save in .png for compressed lossless encoding. Use a different program for more options. Paint.Net is pretty good. The GIMP has a ton of features though the UI is a bit obtuse.
 
Last edited:
what they said paint.net, i 'think' photoshop still has nicer compression (as in you can use a lower % and have good quality), but you can select any level in paint.net over 92% ish looks like bmp..
 
To put it nicely!
Meh, I don't think it's really that bad at all. The issue, methinks, is that everybody and his narcoleptic brother learned Photoshop first so that any deviation from the Photoshop way of doing things seems like a step in the wrong direction.

In a similar fashion the first 3D CAD package I learned extensively was SolidWorks. It was good and I was good at using it. Later I had the opportunity to try Autodesk Inventor, a program of similar function. It was terrible! Every part about the UI and its function was all wrong. I had a tough time getting a good workflow from it since I was fighting it all the time. A colleague of mine had never used either program, but he seemed to pick up Inventor more more quickly. He wasn't drawing on prior experience and making assumptions about how to use the UI. He was just using it.

I learned The GIMP before I learned Photoshop. the GIMP works well for me and I am able to do what I need to do with it. When I use Photoshop (or Elements, more commonly) I end up fighting with the UI because things seem, to me, to be in the wrong places. No, it's not great, but it's not as bad as some make it out to be. To each his own, really. :)

/semi-rant :p
 
The GIMP has a ton of features though the UI is a bit obtuse.

obtuse!

shawshank38.jpeg
 
Meh, I don't think it's really that bad at all. The issue, methinks, is that everybody and his narcoleptic brother learned Photoshop first so that any deviation from the Photoshop way of doing things seems like a step in the wrong direction.

In a similar fashion the first 3D CAD package I learned extensively was SolidWorks. It was good and I was good at using it. Later I had the opportunity to try Autodesk Inventor, a program of similar function. It was terrible! Every part about the UI and its function was all wrong. I had a tough time getting a good workflow from it since I was fighting it all the time. A colleague of mine had never used either program, but he seemed to pick up Inventor more more quickly. He wasn't drawing on prior experience and making assumptions about how to use the UI. He was just using it.

I learned The GIMP before I learned Photoshop. the GIMP works well for me and I am able to do what I need to do with it. When I use Photoshop (or Elements, more commonly) I end up fighting with the UI because things seem, to me, to be in the wrong places. No, it's not great, but it's not as bad as some make it out to be. To each his own, really. :)

/semi-rant :p

It's funny you should use that example, i work for a company which uses CAD and we are switching over to inventor ourselves (v2009 on vista x64 with 8GB of RAM :o) . The guys that have been trialing Inventor for a while already have said very similar things to yourself about the UI.

I take your point, it's not 'wrong' it's just 'different' in the same way the French language puts words in different orders to English
 
Back
Top Bottom