Soldato
- Joined
- 1 May 2003
- Posts
- 11,191
This would be my initial thoughts. Haaland and Bellingham had a right bromance going on at Dortmund.if he went anywhere in the prem he would go city to link up with haaland.
This would be my initial thoughts. Haaland and Bellingham had a right bromance going on at Dortmund.if he went anywhere in the prem he would go city to link up with haaland.
Rather have Enzo if picking from world cup players we saw.Dont know how much truth there is in this but if its true then I'm pretty happy with it, Amrabat really impressed me at the World Cup and I said a few times that he'd make a good alternative for the Fabinho role.
Liverpool 'make Amrabat a top transfer target alongside Bellingham'
Amrabat was a key part of Morocco's run at the World Cup as they became the first ever African side to reach the semi-finals of the tournament, playing every minute in Qatar.www.dailymail.co.uk
I think the two issues there are that Amrabat can likely be had for 35-40m, whereas the price on Fernandez is 100m. Also Amrabat is really a defensive/holding midfielder, so would be a like for like with Fabinho , whereas Fernandez is a more central/attacking midfielder, which I would imagine is the role that Bellingham is wanted for. If you were looking at pairs of midfielders then a pairing of Amrabat and Bellingham would work, or Amrabat and Fernandez...as their positions would compliment each other, rather than Fernandez and Bellingham as they would be too similar I'd say.Rather have Enzo if picking from world cup players we saw.
Ideally id want all three to be honest as that would freshen up the midfield and Enzo and Bellingham both young so would get plenty of years out of them.I think the two issues there are that Amrabat can likely be had for 35-40m, whereas the price on Fernandez is 100m. Also Amrabat is really a defensive/holding midfielder, so would be a like for like with Fabinho , whereas Fernandez is a more central/attacking midfielder, which I would imagine is the role that Bellingham is wanted for. If you were looking at pairs of midfielders then a pairing of Amrabat and Bellingham would work, or Amrabat and Fernandez...as their positions would compliment each other, rather than Fernandez and Bellingham as they would be too similar I'd say.
Yeah I'd agree with having all 3, not sure the financiers would agree with a 250m layout. Truth be told I think we'll only end up getting 1 of the 3 anyway.Ideally id want all three to be honest as that would freshen up the midfield and Enzo and Bellingham both young so would get plenty of years out of them.
We arent strapped for cash but equally I dont see us whacking out 200m on 2 midfielders.I might be wrong but I'm not convinced by the Amrabat links - it feels very much like his agent trying to flush out interest in him. Regarding finances, the club have shown in the past that they're flexible in terms of spending big in the short-term and then making up for it with lower spends later. Something I don't think many people realise also is that for the past 7 years or so, we've spent between £250-300m on the stadium and training ground - that finishes this summer, freeing up a lot of cash.
I think many people would have said the same about signing Alisson and VVD for £140m - across the 17/18 and 18/19 seasons we had a net spend of over £200m and the club are in a far stronger position financially now than then. Fwiw, I'm not sure Fernandez is costing £100m - the talk is his release clause is around that amount but I think you can get him for less.We arent strapped for cash but equally I dont see us whacking out 200m on 2 midfielders.
I think many people would have said the same about signing Alisson and VVD for £140m - across the 17/18 and 18/19 seasons we had a net spend of over £200m and the club are in a far stronger position financially now than then. Fwiw, I'm not sure Fernandez is costing £100m - the talk is his release clause is around that amount but I think you can get him for less.
Last I read they werent (understandably) letting Fernandez go unless his release clause was met. If we are serious about Bellingham, then I feel that signing Amrabat for 35-40m is far more likely to happen than us signing Bellingham and then Fernandez as well but, as with the last transfer window and all the kerfuffle over us needing/not needing a midfielder, all we can do is wait and see what actually happensI think many people would have said the same about signing Alisson and VVD for £140m - across the 17/18 and 18/19 seasons we had a net spend of over £200m and the club are in a far stronger position financially now than then. Fwiw, I'm not sure Fernandez is costing £100m - the talk is his release clause is around that amount but I think you can get him for less.
And we still ended up with a net spend of well over £200m over that period, at a time where we were also spending £50-60m on a new training ground and repaying £100m+ on a loan for our new main stand.You all sold Countinho for 120 million.
I saw that tweet aswellPorto press seem to be adamant were in for Enzo, hope its true.
If in some magic window we got him and bellingham that would be a huge improvement.
Eventually they have to be right sometimesI saw that tweet aswell
Cunha to wolves for 50 mill give or take, seems pretty excessive for someone that appears to be bang average.
I cant help but think that if we go for Enzo it will be because we are out of the running for Bellingham.Porto press seem to be adamant were in for Enzo, hope its true.
If in some magic window we got him and bellingham that would be a huge improvement.
Is this for financial or footballing reasons? I ask because they're very different types of playerI cant help but think that if we go for Enzo it will be because we are out of the running for Bellingham.