• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Wolfdale?

Man of Honour
Joined
14 Nov 2005
Posts
10,722
Location
Up North
Anyone planning on going for a wolfdale based chip? I know it aint a quad but tbh I for one have hardly made use of quad core so I am considering this, especially at the silly overclocks they seem to be getting! Wouldn't mind giving one a try out :p
 
500fsb would get you 4.75ghz which I would think most of the decent x38motherboards are capable of in dual core - nothing to be sniffed at imo and will certainly be more usefull (to me anyway) than a quad at 3.6-4ghz :eek:
 
All I can say is I havn't seen any 'noticable' difference between using a quad at 4ghz to a dual at 4ghz, apart from benchmarks. I don't use the quad to its full capability, I don't do enough encode or use multithreaded applications enough to justify one so although it is great for those that do, raw cpu speed is what will benifit the applications I use most. Don't get me wrong, I would rather have a quad as extra cores are never a bad thing and the yorkfields are fantastic but they look to be crippled by low multi's apart from the top models which are silly £££'s. So the wolfdale cores make more sense for me. I guess 2mb less cache than the current quads is a little downside to things but I can live with that as again, going from a 4mb conroe to an 8mb quad, I didn't notice a difference in having double the cache. Aslong as the wolfdale price isn't too bad (<£200) thats where my upgrade path is gonna take me.

3d mark will soon be dominated by tri-sli and quad xfire, with multicore cpu's being taken into account in the score. Both of which I would love to own but that sort of speed is really only neccesary for high end benchmarking. A high end dual card(3870's/GTS/GTX/ultra) rig is plenty for todays games, even at high res. I for one have lost faith in 3dmark as it is no longer representative of gpu gaming performance. Gaming benchmarks give a far more reliable account of what a graphics card is capable of, I mean who buys a top end gpu to run at 2048x1024 with no AA/AF? Hopefully this will be resolved with 3dmark08 but I seriously doubt it.

Gone are the days when overclocking prowess decided a good overclocker from an average one. Cash and cherry picked samples it seems now dominate which is sad for the true spirit of overclocking.
 
Initially Intel planned to roll-out its code-named Wolfdale and Yorkfield microprocessors that are projected to be marketed under Intel Core 2 Duo and Core 2 Extreme brand-names on the 10th of January, 2008. But the plans have changed and, according to a news-story at HKEPC web-site, Intel will only be able to release dual-core Intel Core 2 Duo 8000-series (Wolfdale) processors in February, while Intel Core 2 Quad 9000-series (Yorkfield) will only see the light of the day in February or March.
 
Back
Top Bottom