• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Wolfenstien 2 Vulkan benchmarks:

CAT-THE-FIFTH said:
So in 4 areas tested,Vega64 seems to edge the GTX1080 in three of them and in two of them is close to a GTX1080TI. In one area it looses.
Click to expand...
PCGH: it's a tie between 1080 and V64,
ComputerBase: It's a tie also, sometimes the V64 wins, sometime the 1080 wins
GameGPU: V64 wins over 1080 by ~10%
In all cases the 1080Ti wins, and by a large margin. More data is needed to determine who is winner between 1080 and V64.
 
Last edited:
CAT-THE-FIFTH said:
In the GameGPU results,the Vega64 wins by a big margin. In the PCGH article,it does still edge ahead though and remember these are AIB models tested too.
Click to expand...
All are AIB models, even Vega. It's a tie. We have 2 tie cases and 1 Vega win over the 1080. I need more data before calling any final winners, also remember NVIDIA didn't yet release any game ready drivers for the title.
 
shankly1985 said:
VEGA 56 vs GTX 1080 Lol No competition...
Click to expand...
Ultra settings are not the highest visual settings, there is another tier above it. Also these numbers are apparently bogus, no other site has the difference so wide. Joker is at it again. Also he didn't do the numbers himself, he just sent it to another tech savy guys (in PresentMon form), so .. !
 
Last edited:
shankly1985 said:
Ultra isn't the highest settings Agreed!! That doesn't mean the results are wrong!! LOL Man! Watch the footage for god sake! Its raw FPS counter in is right on the screen from MSI afterburner!! You saying the game is lying now?
Click to expand...
I am saying his numbers are always out of whack for reasons unknown, his bogus Ryzen 1800X vs 7700K had videos with fps counters as well, his bogus Fall Creator update has fps counters as well, yet none of these videos had any true and valid actual results.

At any rate benching games at Medium settings is rather stupid, high end cards are purchased for max settings, and should be tested with them, you don't see us benching BF1 or Crysis 3 at medium settings to determine who is the winner! That's just stupid!
 
docsonic said:
There is Uber then Mein Leben. I run my 56 at Mein Leben 1440p & I'm over 100fps a lot of the time. The fps in his videos is consistent with my experience in this game.
Click to expand...
But you didn't test the same areas he did, the fact that he does have the same performance at Medium settings as your Max settings really demonstrate how botched up his tests are.
shankly1985 said:
They wasn't wrong they did show nvidia needed to release a driver. It's the same story with this title right now amd is wiping the floor with nvidia.
Click to expand...
AMD is not, see PCGH, ComputerBase and GameGPU testing.
 
Brazo said:
Have another watch, Vega is only ever ahead at the cut scene at the start. In all gameplay the 1080 is comfortably ahead.
Click to expand...
Exactly, this is what I have been saying from the start, as per PCGH and ComputerBase testing, AT MAX SETTINGS, Vega wins in non taxing scenes "like cutscenes", in taxing scenes "like outdoor scenes" NVIDIA wins, sometimes by a massive margin. You can see that in the video which has a nice mix of outdoor and indoor scenes.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom