• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Wolfenstien 2 Vulkan benchmarks:

So are we ignoring the 1080Ti now because it doesn't fit the results we want?

I don't see how it's a win to AMD when there's an Nvidia card at the top of the graph.

"it has to cost between this much and this much, have 8GB of RAM and have 64 in the name somewhere or it doesn't count"

What does the card you own have to do with this?

What's this "we"?? Why do I need a Vega64?? Explain this to me??

You seem very annoyed - you OK??

Edit!!

lUKtsYN.jpg


nSxKaDr.jpg


What pictures soothes you more?? Tell,as next time I will make sure I will post the more soothing picture.

I personally like this one of the GTX1080.

K0xBMF5.jpg


Not biased one bit I tell you! ;) :p
 
Last edited:
So in 4 areas tested,Vega64 seems to edge the GTX1080 in three of them and in two of them is close to a GTX1080TI. In one area it looses.
PCGH: it's a tie between 1080 and V64,
ComputerBase: It's a tie also, sometimes the V64 wins, sometime the 1080 wins
GameGPU: V64 wins over 1080 by ~10%
In all cases the 1080Ti wins, and by a large margin. More data is needed to determine who is winner between 1080 and V64.
 
Last edited:
Sits back with his 1080ti and grins, a monster yet again being a monster and when they bring out the next monster I'll buy that too.
 
PCGH: it's a tie between 1080 and V64,
ComputerBase: It's a tie also, sometimes the V64 wins, sometime the 1080 wins
GameGPU: V64 wins
In all cases the 1080Ti wins, and by a large margin. More data is needed to determine who is winner between 1080 and V64.

In the two Computerbase.de results,the GTX1080 looses by a big margin and wins by a big margin,but in the place where the GTX1080 thrashes the Vega64,all the AMD cards get beaten,even down the range.

In the GameGPU results,the Vega64 wins by a big margin. In the PCGH article,it does still edge ahead though and remember these are AIB models tested too.

Plus in two of the 4 areas tested so far,the Vega64 comes within 10% of the GTX1080TI,and I on purpose didn't link the Core i7 6700 results for GameGPU as it showed with that the GPUs both were tied,which would have biased it towards AMD.

If anything I am still surprised it can even get close to a GTX1080TI in two areas,especially since the card is more GTX1080 level in the first place.

If you also look down the range,you will notice the RX580 shows three out of four wins against the GTX1060. Even looking at that it makes me wonder if AMD have even got RPM working properly,since the RX580 seems to have none of that and still most times seems to beat the GTX1060.

But it has been rather weird the last week- AMD having solid performance in a Nvidia title(Destiny 2) and Nvidia having solid performance in an AMD title.

Sits back with his 1080ti and grins, a monster yet again being a monster and when they bring out the next monster I'll buy that too.

Probably a newer CPU too would be useful - would think in some titles a faster CPU might make it even more of a monster!! :p

Heck,I find even the GTX1080 a solid card at qHD,and some of the recent deals under £450 have made it a good deal too.
 
In the two Computerbase.de results,the GTX1080 looses by a big margin and wins by a big margin,but in the place where the GTX1080 thrashes the Vega64,all the AMD cards get beaten,even down the range.

In the GameGPU results,the Vega64 wins by a big margin. In the PCGH article,it does still edge ahead though and remember these are AIB models tested too.

Plus in two of the 4 areas tested so far,the Vega64 comes within 10% of the GTX1080TI,and I on purpose didn't link the Core i7 6700 results for GameGPU as it showed with that the GPUs both were tied,which would have biased it towards AMD.

If anything I am still surprised it can even get close to a GTX1080TI in two areas,especially since the card is more GTX1080 level in the first place.

If you also look down the range,you will notice the RX580 shows three out of four wins against the GTX1060. Even looking at that it makes me wonder if AMD have even got RPM working properly,since the RX580 seems to have none of that and still most times seems to beat the GTX1060.

But it has been rather weird the last week- AMD having solid performance in a Nvidia title(Destiny 2) and Nvidia having solid performance in an AMD title.



Probably a newer CPU too would be useful - would think in some titles a faster CPU might make it even more of a monster!! :p

Heck,I find even the GTX1080 a solid card at qHD,and some of the recent deals under £450 have made it a good deal too.

Gaming at 4k makes a new cpu next to not worth it for me, I had Ryzen but cancelled. I watched a guy on youtube put a 1080 into an old 750 i5 rig and the difference was around 5fps if that at 4k compared to newer CPU's so I completely changed my mind on it.
 
Gaming at 4k makes a new cpu next to not worth it for me, I had Ryzen but cancelled. I watched a guy on youtube put a 1080 into an old 750 i5 rig and the difference was around 5fps if that at 4k so I completely changed my mind on it.

Ahh,you are at 4K. Only at qHD myself so this current card is plenty for me! :p
 
Surprised to see 1080 Ti still hold performance king in all resolutions.

How really very embarrassed to see what Rapid Packed Math can do to games, absolutely useless and massive waste of time. What a failure.

Look like big poor Vega for a AMD sponsored Vulkan title RTG used most advanced and very expensive newer utter useless technologies like HBM2, HBCC, Rapid Packed Math, Deferred Renderer, Primitive Binning etc that would still not able to outperformed big Pascal in 2017 and upcoming little Volta and big Volta in 2018. :o

:cool:
 
In the GameGPU results,the Vega64 wins by a big margin. In the PCGH article,it does still edge ahead though and remember these are AIB models tested too.
All are AIB models, even Vega. It's a tie. We have 2 tie cases and 1 Vega win over the 1080. I need more data before calling any final winners, also remember NVIDIA didn't yet release any game ready drivers for the title.
 
Or, how about anyone with a card equal to or better than an RX480/GTX1060 "wins" given you can expect perfectly decent framerates?
 
Don't count all your chickens for they may not have hatched, just yet.
GameGPU tested it and saw a win for AMD:

http://gamegpu.com/action-/-fps-/-tps/wolfenstein-ii-the-new-colossus-test-gpu-cpu

Results seem to vary quite a bit.

pzL1fG8.png


EAaloLL.png


FPQXlzG.png


f1E4UNa.png


So in 4 areas tested,Vega64 seems to edge the GTX1080 in three of them and in two of them is close to a GTX1080TI. In one area it looses.

However,even the Polaris cards loose in that one area,so there is something going on which affects all the AMD cards.

Not bad. :)

My advice to a few, don't count your chickens just yet, for they may not have hatched at this time.
 
All are AIB models, even Vega. It's a tie. We have 2 tie cases and 1 Vega win over the 1080. I need more data before calling any final winners, also remember NVIDIA didn't yet release any game ready drivers for the title.
No I think we should jump to conclusions now. It’s not like the forza thread went south for AMD after Shankly and Co fell for click bait!
 
Runs like a dream with my 56 - only downside I now have to go to work:/ Could not find the API toggle though - is vulkan enabled by default for vega?
 
Back
Top Bottom