So a female mate of mine was mentioning that she feels like crap having not being able to get a decent night's sleep recently.
She's currently trying to save money to buy a place next year, and is currently spending a few nights a week at a colleague's house in a box room, when not staying over at her bf's or visiting her parents outside London on weekends.
The main problems she has is that the bed she has been given is really uncomfortable, resulting in a very sore neck, and the fact that the shower in the bathroom doesn't work beyond a trickle, making showering a long effort, and washing her hair pretty much impossible.
Now this is making her feel really unsettled and is getting her down quite a bit.
So me, in all my manly logic, suggest getting a memory foam topper for the bed (£35), as they can make very bad mattresses sleepable (I have a double that I use), and to spend cash on a new shower that works properly.
This is all out of her own pocket, as she is saving a massive amount of money staying with her colleague (Only £100 a month all inc!!!).
Whilst the foam topper is a go, she says she can't get a new shower attachment for the bath, as this would be an insult to her colleague and upset her (???).
I cannot fathom the logic. They are saying in a house where the shower only trickles. She pays for a new shower attachment, and everyone benefits from a proper shower. Where is the harm? Why would her colleague be insulted?
It's not her colleague's property, just an assigned residence from the council as her hubby is a cop. So it's not even like she is dissing their own bought property.
She'd rather suffer and be unhappy for the next 8 or so months than sort the shower out.
WHERE IS THE LOGIC??!?!?
Hnnnnnnggggggg!
She's currently trying to save money to buy a place next year, and is currently spending a few nights a week at a colleague's house in a box room, when not staying over at her bf's or visiting her parents outside London on weekends.
The main problems she has is that the bed she has been given is really uncomfortable, resulting in a very sore neck, and the fact that the shower in the bathroom doesn't work beyond a trickle, making showering a long effort, and washing her hair pretty much impossible.
Now this is making her feel really unsettled and is getting her down quite a bit.
So me, in all my manly logic, suggest getting a memory foam topper for the bed (£35), as they can make very bad mattresses sleepable (I have a double that I use), and to spend cash on a new shower that works properly.
This is all out of her own pocket, as she is saving a massive amount of money staying with her colleague (Only £100 a month all inc!!!).
Whilst the foam topper is a go, she says she can't get a new shower attachment for the bath, as this would be an insult to her colleague and upset her (???).
I cannot fathom the logic. They are saying in a house where the shower only trickles. She pays for a new shower attachment, and everyone benefits from a proper shower. Where is the harm? Why would her colleague be insulted?
It's not her colleague's property, just an assigned residence from the council as her hubby is a cop. So it's not even like she is dissing their own bought property.
She'd rather suffer and be unhappy for the next 8 or so months than sort the shower out.
WHERE IS THE LOGIC??!?!?
Hnnnnnnggggggg!