Wonder Woman 2

the shadow · 13 Jun 2018 at 16:25

Nov 2019

JediFragger · 13 Jun 2018 at 17:02

Why not use it's official title?

VincentHanna · 13 Jun 2018 at 18:08

Wonder Woman 1984? Not really been confirmed as an official title

Patti Jenkins might have just been letting us know when it was set.

Malevolence · 13 Jun 2018 at 18:55

MissChief · 13 Jun 2018 at 18:58

You want to be confused?

Gerard · 13 Jun 2018 at 19:01

MissChief said:
You want to be confused?

Thats in the op.

MissChief · 13 Jun 2018 at 19:10

Gerard said:
Thats in the op.

Ahh didn't see the spoiler!

Efour · 13 Jun 2018 at 19:58

Oh good so Its 80s revival themed stuff again after Ragnarok did so well.

VincentHanna · 13 Jun 2018 at 20:14

Ragnarok wasnt really 80's revival, it just used an 80's style font and neon.

Wizzfizz · 13 Jun 2018 at 21:00

As long as it's better than the first one, as that just sucked hard

JediFragger · 13 Jun 2018 at 21:44

MissChief said:
You want to be confused?

****ing bull**** length on those shorts, in the 80s they'd barely cover your knackers

Tombstone · 14 Jun 2018 at 07:13

MissChief said:
You want to be confused?

Looks like they are following the story of the TV show then where she teams up with Steve Trevors son

Btone · 14 Jun 2018 at 07:45

Tombstone said:
Looks like they are following the story of the TV show then where she teams up with Steve Trevors son

I'm betting it got something to do with Hades

darreny · 15 Jun 2018 at 11:31

JediFragger said:
****ing bull**** length on those shorts, in the 80s they'd barely cover your knackers

darreny · 15 Jun 2018 at 11:31

JediFragger said:
****ing bull**** length on those shorts, in the 80s they'd barely cover your knackers

Triple post

aardvark · 15 Jun 2018 at 12:13

Tombstone said:
Looks like they are following the story of the TV show then where she teams up with Steve Trevors son

that would be super lame

VincentHanna · 15 Jun 2018 at 13:14

aardvark said:
that would be super lame

It also makes no sense.

Wonder Woman was set in 1918. Even if Steve Trevor somehow had a baby with somebody, that baby would be well in to their 60's by 1984

Or do you mean he got Wonder Woman pregnant? In which case it wouldn't be 100% human? But even then babies don't look 100% like their fathers.

aardvark · 15 Jun 2018 at 13:16

VincentHanna said:
It also makes no sense.

Wonder Woman was set in 1918. Even if Steve Trevor somehow had a baby with somebody, that baby would be well in to their 60's by 1984

Or do you mean he got Wonder Woman pregnant? In which case it wouldn't be 100% human? But even then babies don't look 100% like their fathers.

the last point really - maybe its just a dream sequence or some magic shenanigans.

Tombstone · 15 Jun 2018 at 14:07

VincentHanna said:
It also makes no sense.

Wonder Woman was set in 1918. Even if Steve Trevor somehow had a baby with somebody, that baby would be well in to their 60's by 1984

Or do you mean he got Wonder Woman pregnant? In which case it wouldn't be 100% human? But even then babies don't look 100% like their fathers.

Maybe Grandson this time round then, I remember in the TV show, Steve Trevor was WW2, not WW1, so it then made sense when it was his son later on in the show and as they already did it 30 odd years ago in the TV version there is precedent for doing it again in the movie version. I mean lets face it, it makes about as much sense as anything else in a world where theres an invisible island with immortal women on it, who have lightning firing bracelets and a rope which makes you tell the truth

VincentHanna · 15 Jun 2018 at 14:09

True