Woo hoo!

SiriusB

SiriusB

SiriusB

Soldato
Joined
16 Dec 2005
Posts
14,443
Location
Manchester
Yay!

I am folding in Ubuntu again! Couldn't fix the dodgy GRUB issue so just nuked the whole HDD and started again :p

My E6600 is at 3.3GHz so I can't wait to see what it does with this 1760 pointer. My 4400+ @ 2.6GHz managed almost one of these a day.

It feels good to be back, watch out anyone in front and bye bye anyone who thought they were gonna overtake! :D
 
I get through one in 20hours on my 6600 at 3Ghz, thats 2100 ppd:) some of the other SMP wu's are getting less, 3025 gets me 1520 ppd :(


edit
I can't believe I just gave a :( to 1500 ppd, it's still an awesome score compared with the standard client!
 
SiriusB said:
My E6600 is at 3.3GHz so I can't wait to see what it does with this 1760 pointer. My 4400+ @ 2.6GHz managed almost one of these a day.
Click to expand...

My E6600 @ 3.0GHz does one in about 20 hours = 2077 ppd, for reference :)

Edit: D'oh, why didn't I read Dio's post :o

Stan :)
 
What can I say? I'm a sucker for bigger cache :o

FahMon has just this second randomly decided to give me the correct PPD... wait for it... 2450! :D
 
I just this minute opened up the SMP Guide document :p

Now I need to trawl through that thread finding the mistakes THEN I need to update it for Feisty Fawn :(
 
SiriusB said:
My E6600 is at 3.3GHz so I can't wait to see what it does with this 1760 pointer. My 4400+ @ 2.6GHz managed almost one of these a day.
Click to expand...

I'm confused:confused: My +4600 @2.6GHz takes 44 hrs to do a 1760 pointer in VMware.
Do you have a native Linux install or large amounts of RAM?
 
When I had my 4400+ it was a native install and had 2GB of RAM. The 4400+ also has double the cache of the 4200+ so that may be a factor too.

Although for it to take twice as long suggests something else - is your client running on standard loops at all?
 
Pilgrim57 said:
I'm confused:confused: My +4600 @2.6GHz takes 44 hrs to do a 1760 pointer in VMware.
Do you have a native Linux install or large amounts of RAM?
Click to expand...

When I read your post I checked my 4400+ @ 2.6GHz with 1Gb RAM and it takes 37.5 hrs to do one on a native Ubuntu install (Feisty Fawn).

What's your secret SB? :confused:

Edit: My Opty 165 @ 2.6GHz takes nearly 33.5 hrs.

Stan :)
 
Last edited:
You can check my stats if you like, but i was running two smp clients [crazy i know] and i was knocking out two 1760 pointers every couple of days. Maybe they were nice WUs lol
 
SiriusB said:
When I had my 4400+ it was a native install and had 2GB of RAM. The 4400+ also has double the cache of the 4200+ so that may be a factor too.

Although for it to take twice as long suggests something else - is your client running on standard loops at all?
Click to expand...

I only have 1GB of RAM & VMware uses about 300MB.
I have seen the standard loops message before but don't know what that means. SSE optimizations are working though
 
Bigstan said:
When I read your post I checked my 4400+ @ 2.6GHz with 1Gb RAM and it takes 37.5 hrs to do one on a native Ubuntu install (Feisty Fawn).

What's your secret SB? :confused:

Edit: My Opty 165 @ 2.6GHz takes nearly 33.5 hrs.

Stan :)
Click to expand...

I would have to guess Stan that running natively allow more of the RAM to be used compared to my set up. Vmware only suppose to have a 5% overhead, so that wouldn't accountfor the big time difference.
 
The WUs must be different then. Looking at my graph on the 3rd April I dumped 3500ish points, then again 2-3 days later another 3500ish points.

So maybe not one a day, but very close :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom