Worst WU ever?

LordShadow · 27 Nov 2006 at 19:31

Currently got a project 2132 Gromacs, worth 381 points.
Taking forever!
E6600 at 3.3Ghz and its at 99 ppd :|
Anyone else had one of these?

joeyjojo · 27 Nov 2006 at 19:38

Thank God no, not yet

Steevo38 · 27 Nov 2006 at 19:45

Only had one

Project : 2132
Core : Gromacs
Frames : 100
Credit : 381

-- OPTY1 --

Min. Time / Frame : 36mn 12s - 151.56 ppd
Avg. Time / Frame : 36mn 48s - 149.09 ppd

Not one of the better wu's

Let's hope they dry up never to be seen again.

Bet I get a shed full of them now! :eek:

VeNT · 27 Nov 2006 at 20:15

not had that yet
this is my worst!

Project : 1815
Core : Amber
Frames : 100
Credit : 153

-- Folding 1 --

Min. Time / Frame : 13mn 00s - 169.48 ppd
Avg. Time / Frame : 14mn 01s - 157.18 ppd

-- //BRENDA2/Folding 1/ --

Min. Time / Frame : 12mn 55s - 170.57 ppd
Avg. Time / Frame : 13mn 00s - 169.48 ppd

diogenese · 27 Nov 2006 at 20:39

Now this really sucks

It's my only borg, a 2 year old Dell with the cheapest celeron the did at the time. I've no idea of the clockspeed but it's dog slow!

Project : 996
Core : Double Gromacs
Frames : 100
Credit : 130

-- //smeleron/Folding@Home/ --

Min. Time / Frame : 48mn 46s - 38.39 ppd
Avg. Time / Frame : 48mn 46s - 38.39 ppd

joeyjojo · 27 Nov 2006 at 20:55

Rofl of the day goes to diogenese. Look at the old scabby dell "powah"

A double gromacs, they're nice usually. No SSE2 perhaps?

VeNT · 27 Nov 2006 at 21:04

I've a better frame time than that
P3 laptop, only just 1GHz

Project : 2126
Core : Gromacs
Frames : 100
Credit : 373

-- //Laptop2/Folding1/ --

Min. Time / Frame : 1h 51mn 03s - 48.37 ppd
Avg. Time / Frame : 1h 59mn 34s - 44.92 ppd

vs Core 2 Duo 3.2

-- Brenda 1 --

Min. Time / Frame : 26mn 38s - 201.67 ppd
Avg. Time / Frame : 26mn 45s - 200.79 ppd

Freefaller · 27 Nov 2006 at 21:12

Yep I've had a couple of those - it killed my ppd by a fairly hefty chunk :/

Back up to 1300 now so things are looking ok... Until the next handful

MikeTimbers · 27 Nov 2006 at 22:19

There was a big thread over at Stanford about the awful 2124 units. Many people were complaining as it's nonsense that these conform to the same rules as the others. If all the units are properly tested to deliver the same number of ppd these ones obviously slipped the net.

If only I could just get the 24xx Double Gromacs :rolleyes:

dunc · 28 Nov 2006 at 00:29

MikeTimbers said:
There was a big thread over at Stanford about the awful 2124 units.

I have had an awful lot of the awful 2124 units

Dunc

shadowscotland · 28 Nov 2006 at 10:52

dunc said:
I have had an awful lot of the awful 2124 units

Dunc

I see your 49 and raise you 53

Berserker · 28 Nov 2006 at 11:36

41 of the blighters here. No wonder my PPD went to hell.

Recovering now with the aid of some SMP goodness.

VeNT · 28 Nov 2006 at 13:05

I own you all
1808
worst WU ever for me
79
http://fah-web.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/main.py?qtype=userpagedet&username=VeNT&teamnum=10&prange=1000

StevenG · 28 Nov 2006 at 15:09

no bad... but ive had 153's for the past week or something.. i miss my 600's

but i now have my gpu dropping 330 points every 10 1/2 hours

VeNT · 28 Nov 2006 at 15:17

StevenG said:
no bad... but ive had 153's for the past week or something.. i miss my 600's

but i now have my gpu dropping 330 points every 10 1/2 hours

that GPU watercooled?
what kinda temp you get it to ?

StevenG · 28 Nov 2006 at 15:21

HIS aircooled... running at 1.5v 695/810 temps range from 62-72 depending on room temp and if i have my door open.

MikeTimbers · 28 Nov 2006 at 22:37

78x1808
79x1809
53x2124

Yuck

joeyjojo · 28 Nov 2006 at 22:50

MikeTimbers said:
78x1808
79x1809
53x2124

How do you know the exact breakdown?

shadowscotland · 28 Nov 2006 at 22:59

your stats are here joeyjojo-a-gogo

http://fah-web.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/main.py?qtype=userpage&username=JoeyJoJo(OcUK)

joeyjojo · 28 Nov 2006 at 23:12

shadowscotland said:
your stats are here joeyjojo-a-gogo

Oh of course, the detailed listings. Good call, cheers