Soldato
Ah didnt notice that. I assumed all the new chips had hyperthreading enabled as otherwise they would be not much different from the old C2D Quads except for stuff like turbo mode and better power consumption.
It is true that the i5 700 are quad cores with no hyperthreading, but they do perform a fair bit better than C2Q Penryn chips. This benchmark compares the performance of the 2.83GHz C2Q Q9550 with the 2.8GHz i5 760. As you can see, due to the new architecture the i5 is faster clock-for-clock.
Similarly, Sandy Bridge seems like it will be 10-20% faster than current i5/i7 chips. Also similar to nahalem, the top-end i5 will again be a quad core with no hyperthreading and the i7s will all be hyperthreaded.
To echo what has been asked by others - OP, what is the spec of your system you are currently using?
I may be wrong, but I thought it was like this:
i3 = dual core, no hyperthreading
i5 = quad core no hyperthreading
i7= quad core with hypethreading
i7 six core = six core with hyperthreading
i3 (500 series) - dual core, hyperthreading on, turbo boost off, low powered IGP, uses "Clarkdale" core
i5 (600 seres) - dual core, hyperthreading on, turbo boost on, medium powered IGP, uses "Clarkdale" core
i5 (700 series) - Quad core, hyperthreading off, turbo boost on, no IGP - uses more robust "lynnfield" core, so clock-for-clock, core-for-core faster than i5 600 series.
i7 (800 series) - Quad core, hyperthreading on, turbo boost on, no IGP, same Lynnfield core as i5 700 series
i7 (920/930/940/950/960/965/975) - Quad core, hyperthreading on, turbo boost on, no IGP, Bloomfield core
i7 (970/980X) - Hex core, hyperthreading on, turbo boost on, no IGP, Gulftown core
Last edited:
