Would this laptop run GRAW

Plec · 28 Jun 2007 at 00:15

Hi

Would the following laptop spec run GRAW?:

Processor: AMD Turion 64 MK-36 - 2GHz, up to 1.6GHz FSB, 512KB L2 Cache
RAM: 1024MB DDR2
Graphics: NVidia GeForce Go7300 128MB
OS - XP

The person buying the above laptop doesn't mind playing the game in low res, and poor texture settings etc - just as long it is playable without stuttering etc.

-Nick- · 28 Jun 2007 at 00:18

on low setting and depending on res it should, but it wouldn't run the best, well i don't know, maybe someone can confirm this

peetee · 28 Jun 2007 at 03:52

should do, my mate plays it on his laptop, not sure on processor, not a flash laptop though, must be about 1.8, x700 graphics & 1gb ddr, that one should be fine on low etc.

kingo15 · 28 Jun 2007 at 08:42

http://www.systemrequirementslab.com/referrer/srtest

this might help run it on his laptop thou

steveo · 28 Jun 2007 at 08:52

cheers for that link kingo cool site

SK07 · 28 Jun 2007 at 09:24

GRAW is a terrible game. Get Vegas if anything. Or even Raven Sheild.

peetee · 28 Jun 2007 at 12:21

thats ** own opinion, and its not remotely constructive in this thread. Vegas has even less chance of running well.

Plec · 28 Jun 2007 at 13:18

Thanks for all the replies guys - especially the link.

Plec

VeNT · 28 Jun 2007 at 13:21

SK07 said:
GRAW is a terrible game. Get Vegas if anything. Or even Raven Sheild.

nominee for kook of the month

tomanders91 · 28 Jun 2007 at 16:06

if im honest with you.... no, it wont work well at all.

Someone i know who has a PC with these specs:

7600GT 256mb overclocked
1024mb ram
AMD 3700 overclocked

had to run it had 800x600 with everything on low, still with a low FPS and stuttering.

It is EXTREMELY demanding for a game that now doesnt even look that good.

You could try it though.

peetee · 28 Jun 2007 at 16:50

tomanders91 said:
if im honest with you.... no, it wont work well at all.

Someone i know who has a PC with these specs:

7600GT 256mb overclocked
1024mb ram
AMD 3700 overclocked

had to run it had 800x600 with everything on low, still with a low FPS and stuttering.

It is EXTREMELY demanding for a game that now doesnt even look that good.

You could try it though.

that sounds wierd, a 7600GT and 3700 is more powerful than my mates laptop and his ran it fine..
Hell, i used to run it fine on my x800xtpe and 3500 with 1gb.. Your mate sounds like hes due a format, or something is seriously crippling his system, i remember it running perfect on my setup like that at medium or so settings, perfectly acceptable. It does look that good on a c2d, 2gb and an 8800 you liar

OspreyO · 28 Jun 2007 at 17:02

The demo ran poorly on my 9400/7900GS too. Maybe your mate has Harry Potters Laptop? Ran ok on a 7950GTX/M1710 I had for a while. I thought it looked ok. But its seriusly demanding. The full game might run faster than the demo though.

http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=293&type=expert&pid=7

peetee · 28 Jun 2007 at 17:10

saying that he looks a bit like harry potter..

Flammy · 28 Jun 2007 at 20:03

tomanders91 said:
if im honest with you.... no, it wont work well at all.

Someone i know who has a PC with these specs:

7600GT 256mb overclocked
1024mb ram
AMD 3700 overclocked

had to run it had 800x600 with everything on low, still with a low FPS and stuttering.

It is EXTREMELY demanding for a game that now doesnt even look that good.

You could try it though.

I have to agree with this, my laptop (sempron 3000, 1gb ram, radeon x700) can barely run it at lowest settings. Even on my desktop with a 6800GT it doesn't run brilliantly. Not a very well optimised game I think.