Would this setup/scenario work?

Associate
Joined
9 Jun 2005
Posts
2,207
Location
A Beer Garden in the Toon
Ok, imagine I have the following setup.

New iMac and MacBook, and a Windows Xp PC around my house.

I buy an AirPort Extreme. These 3 PC's should connect ok, yes?

Now I throw into the mix an USB hub, connected to the AirPort, and into the Hub a Printer and External HardDrive.

I would be able to share the printer and HDD on the network, yes?

BUT, would Time Machine work?

Thanks and sorry for the long post lol

EDIT: Actually, a USB WFi back up device is going to be stupidly slow isn't it?
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
16 Oct 2005
Posts
13,793
Ok, imagine I have the following setup.

New iMac and MacBook, and a Windows Xp PC around my house.

I buy an AirPort Extreme. These 3 PC's should connect ok, yes?

Now I throw into the mix an USB hub, connected to the AirPort, and into the Hub a Printer and External HardDrive.

I would be able to share the printer and HDD on the network, yes?

BUT, would Time Machine work?

Thanks and sorry for the long post lol

EDIT: Actually, a USB WFi back up device is going to be stupidly slow isn't it?

Yes it will connect fine, and yes it should work through a USB hub.

I don't know if time machine can backup over a network, but your right it would be painfully slow for the first backup, after that it only backs up any changes since the last, so won be too bad.
 
Associate
Joined
23 Oct 2002
Posts
1,684
Location
Moseley
Time Machine will work best if you connect it directly to the actual Mac for the first back up. Then removing it and put it on the Airport Extremememememe, I have seen anecdotal evidence of success - but haven't done it myself.

d
 
Associate
Joined
6 Aug 2004
Posts
2,084
Location
Essex
Slightly off topic,

Can you format an external HDD so that both Windows and Mac can read/write to it ? Is this ok to do, or is it simply not recommended?

Thanks
 
Soldato
Joined
16 May 2006
Posts
11,334
Location
Dubai
Slightly off topic,

Can you format an external HDD so that both Windows and Mac can read/write to it ? Is this ok to do, or is it simply not recommended?

Thanks

Fat32 is supported for both Mac/Windows.
NTFS is readable on Mac (no writing)
HFS is not even readable on Windows - unless you install MacDrive, which I've tried under Vista, works like a charm but refuse to work on my XP machine.
 
Caporegime
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
26,103
For something which is readable and writeable in OS X and Windows, I'd use NTFS and then install NTFS-3G in OS X.

However, if it's plugged into the AirPort and shared over SMB and AFP, it doesn't matter what format the drive is as long as the AirPort can understand it, so you could use an HFS+ drive in the AirPort and still write to it from Windows.
 
Soldato
Joined
16 May 2006
Posts
11,334
Location
Dubai
I just tried it. It does work with Windows and OS X but the read and write speed is s-l-o-w. I was copying a 120GB from HFS+ to my macbook, took 50mins. Set to copy the same files over the the same drive under NTFS-3G however, has an estimated time of 8hours.

I waited for the 1GB to transfer and that took over 5minutes.

Good idea but not very practical when it comes to file transfering... Fat32 is faster than the NTFS-3G from what I've observed.

Edit:
Comments on NTFS-3G
https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=3156578562014006371&postID=955067704278387169
Very interesting...
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom