So here's the best part.
Following an accident, she called our insurer to state that she (Jane Doe the company employee) had crashed into a garden wall.
They asked who the third party was, she stated that it was also she (Jane Doe the human being)
They asked her to clarify, she explained that she had crashed her company car into her own wall, damaging both car and wall. She was now looking for her employer to replace the garden wall as it was their fault. This crash was apparently not her fault (as Jane Doe the human), it was the fault of Jane Doe the company employee, who could not be classed as the same person.
I would love to hear the verdict on this from an insurer, but I can tell you what our insurers said, and it wasn't "Yes madam, that's fine"