Would you buy a motherboard with no SATA ports?

Soldato
Joined
1 Apr 2014
Posts
19,039
Location
Aberdeen
My latest build (see sig) uses only NVME drives. The SATA ports sit unused. But they still consume valuable motherboard space and valuable chipset PCIe lanes. I could live with SATA ports being relegated to just two or even to an add-in card.

Edit: I’m not suggesting that no motherboard have SATA ports, just asking if one of the manufacturers made one without, would you be interested?
 
Last edited:
I'm not suggesting it should be standard, just if you would buy one were the option available . It took over a decade to get rid of PATA / IDE.

Ah, think you should add that to OP.

Still lightly not for me. On a ITX build definitely, but mini builds are expensive anyway. All cost dependent really in my eyes.
 
Slow spinning drives have no place in my computer so yes I would, I would also be quite happy to loose most of the USB 3.2 ports too, they are a waste of bandwidth that could be better used as mentioned on stuff like 10Gb etc and NVMe/better wired PCIe Slots.

I use SATA SSD/HDDs in my NAS, best place for them, no need for more than 2Gb/s transfers there, limited speed ability even over 20GB LAN..
 
I could, as I don't use them on my Gigabyte itx board just 2 M.2's. For other uses I would need probably only 3 or 4 for storage of photos, music and some recorded TV.
 
Not until nvme drives become much cheaper for mass storage and the boards have more M.2 ports.

This. I have 3 x 8TB drives in my machine, which now need to be upgraded as I've run out of space. I also use a Blu-ray writer, so definitely would not buy a mobo without SATA.

However, if larger storage with NVME was a similar price to bigger HDD storage drives than I'd probably survive - could always get a USB-driven Blu-ray solution.
 
To answer my own question, I definitely see motherboards with no SATA ports becoming normal in the corporate space. The fewer the wires the better. It's already normal with laptops.
 
Back
Top Bottom