I found the footage average at best especially the penchant for documentary makers to use incorrect library footage for what is being described/narrated such as showing footage of a Sherman at the supposed Battle of Gazala when anybody knows it's the famous footage from the opening barrage of 2nd El Alamein when Britain used M4s in a large action for the first time
, some of it was very good and appropriate but other was often in the wrong context. Also found some of the "historical" interpretation to be verging on the revisionist at times which is becoming all to common with a younger generation of WWII historians with a political chip on their shoulder. What I did find very good were the reminiscences of the protagonists and civilians caught up in events, some of it was extremely moving.