X1900 ... what is known ?

[lemonkettaz]

it would be funny if they didnt...

they went on a longer tea break than usual...

 

[fornowagain]

Can you read Hungarian? These results are a lillte different.

 

[mattio1980]

talk about rip it apart die nvidia die

im getting a lasy on just thinking about whan i get one of these cards

 

[Goksly]

Can you read Hungarian? These results are a lillte different.

Graphs based on percentage are quite iffy. They have picked very high res benchmarks, so 10fps more could result in a 300% increase etc.
I prefer actualy figures....
What I find interesting is the daily tech figures considering they are using drivers probably over a month old.... roll on tesuday?

 

[D.P.]

Review X1900XT vs 7800GTX 256MB

From this review, people with a 7800GTX512 will be quite smug!

Maybe that is why Nvidia wont release the G71 until March, there is just no need and there wouldn't be any competition for it.

 

[AWPC]

Manual has been leaked now(try the popular hardware news sites).

What we really need now are some benchies showing the latest games vs gtx512. That is the only way to know what is best for performance as the benchmarks do not tell the real world story.

 

[LoadsaMoney]

From this review, people with a 7800GTX512 will be quite smug!

Maybe that is why Nvidia wont release the G71 until March, there is just no need and there wouldn't be any competition for it.

Yup, it doesn't look that good, in BF2 they are equal with no AA, and only a couple ahead when its added, but it is only supposed to be the daddy at the shader intesnive games, thats why it looks good at Fear, and CoD2, but when will all these shader intensive games start to appear, not exactly flooding the market, were still waiting for the SM3.0 lot lol, and how longs that been around, i still say ppl should just get the x1800 and save a packet as all the x1900 is is to get 1up on Nvidia, by the time the x1900 comes into its own, we'll be a few generations ahead.

 

[D.P.]

http://www.beyond3d.com/forum/showthread.php?t=25802&page=32

Seems like those dailytech numbers must be wrong:

ooking at these results I fear(pun intended) that the GTX512 will already put hurting on the X1900XT.

http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=2575&p=4

Shows 53fps with no AA+AF where as the dailytech shows only 45fps.

Actually .. the DailyTech Results don't make sense.

Code:

Game GTX256 X1900XT BF2 1600x1200 4xAA 53 FPS 57 FPS

http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=310

while this shows the GTX256 and X1800XT and GTX512 gets higher scores at the same Res.
http://www.techreport.com/reviews/20...tx-512/bf2.gif

Better pray that those dailytech scores for X1900XT are wrong because if they are, the memory controller will be the only saving grace for R580. That article shows 61fps on the X1900XT in FEAR at 16x12 - the GTX512 already averages higher than that.

I wouldnt want to be the one having to explain why a 48-shader part at 625Mhz is trailing a 24-shader part at 550Mhz in the most shader bound game on the market.

 

[Subtlesnake]

ATI's own benchmarks:

http://www.hardwareoc.hu/index.php/p/news/cid/1/y/9617.html

Remember the graph is truncated.

 

[LoadsaMoney]

oops.

 

[fornowagain]

ATI's own benchmarks:

http://www.hardwareoc.hu/index.php/p/news/cid/1/y/9617.html

Remember the graph is truncated.

I posted that about five answers back. Is it sure they are ATI's benchmarks? This is the best I could get from an online translator. Make of that what you can.

THE minaret hozzám run into yes long ATI documentation several test across indicate be the soon show up videokártya raw erejét.

THE words instead of beszéljenek the chart , show up , that the Radeon XT version igencsak considerable teljesítménytöbbletet yield , absolutely this nagyrészt the db pixel shader processzornak owing , however there is one more yes is it interesting data , the ben the cards 12.500 score towards fulfil , whilst the NVIDIA GTX 13.000 towards.