• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

X1900GT Software Crossfire

Associate
Joined
20 Apr 2006
Posts
2,037
Location
Leeds, UK
Firstly, thanks go to The_Asgard for his input and his encouragment to try this setup!

As reported in another thread, I've purchased a HIS X1900GT to Crossfire with my Connect3D X1900GT and successfully got it to work!

Both cards are of the 575/600 Core/Mem variety, and this on an Asus P5WD2 motherboard with a PCI-Ex Config of 16x/4x lanes. The rest of my spec is in my sig.

At present, I haven't had a lot of time to play, but here's the initial feedback with my original single card results.

Single Card under 16x PCI-Ex, Omega 6.7 Drivers, 600/625 Clocks:
2005 - 8984
2006 - 4576

Single Card under 4x PCI-Ex, Omega 6.7 Drivers, 600/625 Clocks:
2005 - 7738 = 13.87% Output loss over 16x
2006 - 4122 = 9.92% Output loss over 16x

Crossfire setup with 16x/4x PCI-Ex Bandwidth, Catalyst 6.9, 575/600Clocks:
2005 - 10751 = 20% Increase over Single Card in 16x Lanes.
2006 - 7402 = 61% Increase over Single Card in 16x Lanes.

Observations:
These were taken with the same Quality settings as the Single card results, and Catalyst A.I set to 'Standard'.

Its interesting the disparity between the two benchmarks. Although Driver differences and clock differences may acount for around another 5% improvement, as advised by many people the PCI-Ex is limiting the potential here. If we take the base '10% loss' for the PCI-Ex 4x slot and the fact Crossfire is transferring images across the bus to the first card for output, I think the system does pretty well.

The good news here really is that 72 Pixel Shaders do help, and will help with Next-Gen games :D

Whats more interesting though, is game performance. Again, this was done with Catalyst A.I set to 'standard', and thus using Supertiling/Scissor mode where appropiate. I don't have anyway of testing for framerates, but I was able to take both FEAR and Oblivion for a spin last night, increasing the quality settings.

FEAR
In Fear, I have moved from 1024x768 at 2xAA/4xAF to 1280x960 at 2xAA/16xAF and HQAF. The initial stuttering that I used to suffer from once the level had initially loaded has now all but dissapeared, and I get no 'bog downs' in speed at critical moments. It feels as if the second card can takes the strain when numerous grenades go off and massive firefights breakout, where before I got the odd glitch.

Oblivion
In Oblivion, I've gone from 1024x768 with 0xAA/4xAF, HDR and quality sliders set to default (I'd say medium to high in-game settings) to 1280x1024 at 0xAA/16xAF, HDR and all in-game detail settings are to the max. I get no stutter in outdoor area's and is very smooth unlike before hand. Before the game was certainly playable, but the experience now is a lot better as well.

I haven't tried a 'chuck' patch yet to get AA with HDR working yet, as soon as this is integrated into the main driver I'll give it a spin.

Next Steps:
I'm going to try forcing AFR mode by selecting Catalyst A.I to 'High', and re-run the benchmarks.

If anyone can recommend a way of benchmarking my games to see the improvements, please let me know.

Additionally, the clocks on the single card were higher than the standard clocks on the Crossfire setup, so I'm going to 'crack the nut' of Crossfire overclocking and see just how far this can go.

Conclusion
Now for the (un)surprising bit - I wouldn't recommend anyone plump for software crossfire. I've only indulged because the setup only cost me an extra £150 to implement, and the returns don't justify the expense.

Luckily when I upgraded my sempron to this current PenD 805, I bought a half decent PSU as well that supports SLI/Crossfire with enough amps. At 580 Watts sustained and 38 Amps on the combined 12v rails, its pushing it, but its stable. So if you take the cost as being £270 for two cards and possibly a PSU upgrade, then I'd say get a 512MB XT instead.

Also, if you chuck the fact in as well that their is no 'true' 16x/16x PCI-Ex motherboard available right now for any Intel platform, then this combination isn't going to live up to most peoples expectations - when we have this platform available (RD600 .... hopefully) then maybe we'll see software crossfire work to its potential.

Hope you find this useful,

Arthalen

 
hmm, i recieved a new psu yesterday for a 650w qtec which i gave to someone. the person just sent me me a brand new hiper Type-M 580w psu, which is basically the non modular version of the type R. not a bad swap ehh?

its got more power than the current 480w hiper im using, but im just to lazy to change the psu's round.

would it be worth it for me to go to the hassle of swapping the psu's around?
 
I have that same 'non-modular' 580watt PSU - Its been rock solid for me, supports my Crossfire and my power crazed PenD 805 :D
 
Arthalen said:
I have that same 'non-modular' 580watt PSU - Its been rock solid for me, supports my Crossfire and my power crazed PenD 805 :D


thats really good those pentium D's take up loads of power. makes me want to swap the psu;s round. but im just way too lazy to grab the case and pop it open and change it around.

i may do it on the weekend i guess.

shocked it handles that crossfire setup and that cpu without blowing up.

just to confirm this is the psu i was given:
http://hipergroup.com/English/products/hpu-4m580.html
the reciept shows the guy paid 52 quid for it and its got 3 year warranty.
his old psu blew up on him and only psu i had at the time was a 650w qtec in the cupboard so i fitted that for him and he said that he will replace it for me since cash was of no interest to me at the time.

looks like the psu is part modular has some funny cables with it too??
 
Last edited:
@Cyber-Mav

Yep, that's the exact same one I have. The 'modular cables' just give you extra molex/berg connectors basically. Did you get the instruction pamphlet ?! Very important you follow the guidelines in it for how many devices you place on each voltage supply line.

On Mine, I'm basically using
24pin ATX
8pin EATX
6pin PCI-Ex
2x4pin -> 6pin PCI-Ex

Everything else is hanging off the last cable coming out, Which is basically A DVD/CDRW Combi, SATA HD, 4 case fans, a WC pump, 2 UV lights...
 
yea i did get the full box etc with it, just looking inside now and saw a wiring diagram on a bit of card. bloody looks complex to setup. will read it up nextime im headding to the crapper :D
 
Nice work m8.

I really do feel that the software implentation of Xfire is really holding this setup back and hopefully things will get better with future cat revisions.

AtiTools OSD can be used for measuring FPS however there did seem to be some issues that seemed to be sorted if you Alt Tabbed out of the game.
 
Arthalen said:
@Cyber-Mav

Yep, that's the exact same one I have. The 'modular cables' just give you extra molex/berg connectors basically. Did you get the instruction pamphlet ?! Very important you follow the guidelines in it for how many devices you place on each voltage supply line.

On Mine, I'm basically using
24pin ATX
8pin EATX
6pin PCI-Ex
2x4pin -> 6pin PCI-Ex

Everything else is hanging off the last cable coming out, Which is basically A DVD/CDRW Combi, SATA HD, 4 case fans, a WC pump, 2 UV lights...


im a bit shocked to say the least, was poking around on here:
http://www.ati.com/technology/crossfire/buildyourown2.html

the ati crossfire psu certification site, and this hiper 580 i have lying around here is the exact same model thats on the x1900 crossfire approved list. dang, looks like im gonna have to put the effort in after all and swap the psu out with mine, can leave it till the weekend though i guess. :D
 
Good work Arthalen. Glad to hear that the hiper 580w can handle all that. Your 3dmark05 score is surprisingly low, but the 06 score is about what a pair of 7900gts would get with that CPU.
 
Back
Top Bottom