• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

xeons and nforce 680?

Associate
Joined
10 Apr 2006
Posts
67
Location
grays/uk
looking to build a quad dx10 monster shortly :D , are the the xeons ok in nforce 680 boards?, looking at the abit in9 32x max. thanks for any help :)
 
On the same subject (slightly :)), what's the difference between these 2 chips, they look pretty much identical to me: Xeon 3200 and this one Q6600

Only difference seems to be the bundled games!
 
munge said:
On the same subject (slightly :)), what's the difference between these 2 chips, they look pretty much identical to me: Xeon 3200 and this one Q6600

Only difference seems to be the bundled games!

The Xeon is a server chip and is likely to be made from higher grade silicon and therefore should overclock beterr.
 
El Jimben said:
The Xeon is a server chip and is likely to be made from higher grade silicon and therefore should overclock beterr.

So same basically as the Opterons then? So why is it cheaper?
 
I was wondering the same. Are these chips fine in standard 775 boards, have a little spare money and cant make my mind whether to upgrade cpu or gfx card atm. Any advice appreciated.
 
Philio said:
If you look around you can get them for a fair bit cheaper without the games too.

You mean you can buy stuff from somewhere other than OcUK?!!! ;)
 
lol :)

Well most sites are very close on price, but there is one particular site that is considerably cheaper ;)
 
The cheaper Xeon - the 3210 - only has an 8x multiplier.
The true equivalent to the Q6600 is the Xeon X3220 (9x multiplier).
This costs coonsiderably more than the Q6600.
 
PinkFloyd said:
Yeh equivilent to Opterons.

socket 939 Opterons were cheaper than normal AMD64s when they came out too iirc :)

Can understand why the Opterons were cheaper, after all, AMD didn't really envisage them being so popular as a desktop chip. I'm sure Intel looked at the Opteron pricing and factored that into the equation, although I suppose with an 8x multi, perhaps it's less attractive to the overclocking buyers who after all were the main buyers of Opterons outside the server market.
 
Up until this morning i had mine in a rev2 evga 680i


p35 is sooooooooooooo much better for overclocking/stability :D

Only go 680 if you 100% know you will be using sli and using it properly i.e. 1920x1200 or bigger.
 
I'd guess he must have upgraded to a new P35. ;)

I'd be interested to see how you get on with that lay-z-boy. What clocks and volts you at with it?

gt
 
Bito said:
...
The true equivalent to the Q6600 is the Xeon X3220 (9x multiplier).
This costs coonsiderably more than the Q6600.

The X3220 is approx. £20 more than the Q6600 at the moment - well worth it imo, especially if you're planning to o/c at all.
 
The Xeon X3210 works fine on the Asus P5N32-E SLI plus. Mine clocked at 333 fsb straight out of the box on stock volts. The same can not be said for the Geil PC6400 800MHz DDR2.

I think that the P5N32 is based on 650i though, not the 680i, depends who you believe.
 
Back
Top Bottom