You thought 56 pointers were bad...

Mikebert4 · 26 Jul 2006 at 07:38

So, i've had a run of 56-pointers in the past (woo), and i've oggled at the shear lack of points. Luckily, these have been interspersed with 200-400 pointers so i've done alright.

However, i've just completed... (wait for it)... a 41 ponter! :confused:

and it took longer than the cursed 56-pointers scraping along at a measly 62ppd

Project 774, if anyone else gets this i cry for you.

Elston · 26 Jul 2006 at 13:26

I thought 56 pointers were the lowest you could get, had a number of them over the last week, so i thought i would check what i'm currently folding.......Doh! :rolleyes:

75 ppd at this rate. Actually it appears i have done 3 of these so far this week. No wonder my weekly total has slowly dropped over the last few weeks.

tom_e · 26 Jul 2006 at 13:44

think yourself lucky im doing a 36 pointer at the min

Mattus · 26 Jul 2006 at 14:00

I have a 774 going at the moment. 96ppd, fun fun!

Locrian · 26 Jul 2006 at 14:27

Hey guys top this, i just got a 27 pointer! Argh! They only good thing about these is on my X6800 I can actually watch the % bar rise in EMIII

07.26, 6am 27 1

Mattus · 26 Jul 2006 at 14:52

What's the X6800 like for folding? How long's it gonna take to do that WU? Do you have two instances running?

shadowscotland · 26 Jul 2006 at 15:00

not going for one upmanship but had an 18 pointer this morning on a borg PC.

Not sure if it was a real WU or an out of time WU

Edit: was part of a 774 (so don't count)

Elston · 26 Jul 2006 at 15:13

According to the F@H website 23 pointers (963's) are the lowest projects at the moment.

Indy500 · 26 Jul 2006 at 17:28

All 7xx projects on the cores here, sucks.

Mikebert4 · 27 Jul 2006 at 21:22

i'm back up to a 120pointer (yipee!) and chugging along at 220ppd

Elston · 27 Jul 2006 at 23:17

After a further two 41 pointers what do i get.........a 36 pointer. Bah!

My other box has been getting 359 pointers, so it's not all bad.

lee87 · 28 Jul 2006 at 10:13

I'm doing a 36 pointer as well with a very low ppd

Project : 776
Core : Gromacs
Frames : 100
Credit : 36

-- Core 2 --

Min. Time / Frame : 9mn 15s - 56.04 ppd
Avg. Time / Frame : 9mn 15s - 56.04 ppd

shadowscotland · 28 Jul 2006 at 10:43

latest borg been doing a 776

took two days (20h) but then is is a 600 celeron

VeNT · 28 Jul 2006 at 10:47

gah I've got two of these running!

Locrian · 28 Jul 2006 at 12:28

Mattus said:
What's the X6800 like for folding? How long's it gonna take to do that WU? Do you have two instances running?

Ive had EMIII running for a while now so here is the handy html output for you. Im running 2 instances 24/7 at stock speeds although this i my main rig so results vary allot depending on what im doing

X6800 Output

shadowscotland · 28 Jul 2006 at 13:07

some great PPD's their Locrian - nice work
Edit: excerlent out put on your three machines also :cool:

Stan_Lite · 28 Jul 2006 at 13:55

Impressive

I know what I'm going to be using for any further additions to the farm from now

Stan

Mattus · 28 Jul 2006 at 14:04

Very impressive - seems to average about 190ppd/core on these rubbish p7x WUs which are giving everyone else more like 100. Can't wait to see it on some decent-output WUs!

SiriusB · 28 Jul 2006 at 14:20

Closer to 120ppd on the 7xx WUs for me. Had an odd output spike too - 345 according to EOC :eek:

Highest pointer I have had in a week is a few 120s. No idea where the spike came from lol.

SiriusB

shadowscotland · 28 Jul 2006 at 14:28

SB - a non-deadline WU that has been sitting around on my farm has just uploaded - might be the same for you.

And to confirm SB point above my 805 rig is 120ppd per core on 7xx, but the stock P4 are between 90-105

You thought 56 pointers were bad...

Man of Honour