Your game of choice MUST play at max settings at AT LEAST 60fps. Anyone else understand this logic?

Soldato
Joined
25 Jun 2009
Posts
3,491
Location
Weston-super-Mare
For example

My first pc (that was MINE) my game of choice was counter-strike 1.6. for this i was using a Pentium D and some awful gfx card and i was getting a solid 99fps. I was happy with this for 3 years

then i grudgingly switched to cs:s (as i had no friends left that played cs 1.6). i couldn't MAX cs:s with the crappy gfx card so i got me a e6600 and a HD4870. this let me play at >100fps with all settings maxed +AA and i was happy for 4 years or whatever.

Now Diablo 3 and CS:GO are almost upon us. I am sure these will be the games i will be playing for the next 3 or 4 years (as i loooooved d2 so much even though it was horribly outdated around the time i got my Pentium D lol). So in preparation i e-auctioned my e6600 system (despite it meeting the recommended requirements) as i know deep down that i will have to lower the AA or texture settings a notch or two in order to keep 60fps.

to me it makes perfect sense to have a system that will play your daily game easily at max, yet people don't understand and think my logic is flawed?

obviously i have a dable at the newer games but I always find i have a game or two I'm obsessed with for years.

PLEASE tell me my fellow OCUK members know where I'm coming from with this.

It's not so much that I need a new system to be able to play my new game of choice, but to me its a sign its time to upgrade...
 
hmmm I'm not sure i got my point across properly. I'm not saying i need to play every game maxed out, but that when a new game becomes the game that i can see myself religiously for 3+ years, that THAT game should be maxed out as ill be playing it for 1000+ hours i want it to look pretty lol.
 
Back
Top Bottom