Zalman CNPS9500 Vs. Watercooling

Soldato
Joined
28 Mar 2006
Posts
4,379
Location
Jarrow, Tyne And Wear
does watercooling in a everyday sort of situation offer any better cooling than a zalman CNPS9500 at all?
 
Dutch Guy said:
Not all beat a Zalman but most reasonable sets do, what you need to remember is to get at least a 120mm radiator and a reasonable pump.

Pumps doesn't affect the temp a lot though. 60-100 l/h is enough :)
 
erm, u meen gallons per hour?

60 litres an hour is seriously weak

the eheim 1048 is regarded as a low flow pump and that does 600litres per hour :p
 
IamMed said:
erm, u meen gallons per hour?

60 litres an hour is seriously weak

the eheim 1048 is regarded as a low flow pump and that does 600litres per hour :p

No, I mean litres per hour. But the thing is that the flow will rarely be as high as stated. If you buy a pump stated to pump 600 l/h, you most certanily won't get that much flow(in a normal setup). Especially if you cool cpu, gpu, chipset, harddrives, psu ext. I have an article testing how much the flow affects the temperature, but it's in norwegian. http://www.hardware.no/guider/kjoling/betydningen_av_flow_i_et_vannkjolingssytem/23408/1

See if you get it! :D
 
IamMed said:
erm, u meen gallons per hour?

60 litres an hour is seriously weak

the eheim 1048 is regarded as a low flow pump and that does 600litres per hour :p
Very bad set, has a pump that pumps 27 liters per hour: http://xbitlabs.com/articles/coolers/display/16watercooling_24.html

30 liters per hour: http://xbitlabs.com/articles/coolers/display/16watercooling_9.html

If I look at the performance of the kits in the Xbit review there is a trend that pumps do matter, but not as much as radiators.
 
Back
Top Bottom