14 Nov 2006 at 20:38 #1 nickels nickels Associate Joined 18 Aug 2004 Posts 1,886 Location midlands hi could someone tell me what the difference is between these? thanks nickels
14 Nov 2006 at 20:43 #2 MagicalTrevor MagicalTrevor Associate Joined 2 Dec 2004 Posts 314 Location Parallel Dimension they are just different compression techniques... rar tends to be more efficient than zip, thus resulting in a smaller file size. ace/tar etc. theres quite a few.
they are just different compression techniques... rar tends to be more efficient than zip, thus resulting in a smaller file size. ace/tar etc. theres quite a few.
14 Nov 2006 at 21:38 #3 Kerplunk Kerplunk Soldato Joined 10 Jan 2006 Posts 9,414 Location Bournemouth tbh I just use .rar as it has better compression. i dont think there is much difference between them really.
I just use .rar as it has better compression. i dont think there is much difference between them really.
14 Nov 2006 at 22:29 #4 MarcLister MarcLister Soldato Joined 7 Mar 2005 Posts 19,612 Location LU7 Kerplunk said: i dont think there is much difference between them really. Click to expand... Think I just found some. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAR http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_file_archivers
Kerplunk said: i dont think there is much difference between them really. Click to expand... Think I just found some. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAR http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_file_archivers
14 Nov 2006 at 22:32 #5 Kerplunk Kerplunk Soldato Joined 10 Jan 2006 Posts 9,414 Location Bournemouth tbh Like I said
14 Nov 2006 at 22:44 #6 nickels nickels Associate OP Joined 18 Aug 2004 Posts 1,886 Location midlands thanks a lot nickels