Zune Teaser Web Site Goes Live
- Thread starter scoopex
- Start date
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/5205296.stm
I Wish them luck Nokia already are using their main selling point. I bet Apple will beat them to it too.
I Wish them luck Nokia already are using their main selling point. I bet Apple will beat them to it too.
http://www.zuneinsider.com/
Video of the interface. Just bought my Vision:M so I guess I'll stick to it for a while as it's such a brilliant DAP.
Video of the interface. Just bought my Vision:M so I guess I'll stick to it for a while as it's such a brilliant DAP.
Playsforsure?
Not if you have Zune: http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2006/09/15#a2498
Not being able to play Windows DRM Media is pathetic.
And Microsoft Partners – left Deadforsure!
Not if you have Zune: http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/cmusings/2006/09/15#a2498
Not being able to play Windows DRM Media is pathetic.
And Microsoft Partners – left Deadforsure!
Associate
- Joined
- 15 Jun 2006
- Posts
- 2,178
- Location
- Amsterdam
Zune’s Big Innovation: Viral DRM
Now that Microsoft has released some hard facts about Zune we can finally begin to sort out how much of an impact the product might have on the digital music market. For weeks we’ve been hearing rumors about how Zune’s wireless capabilities will be used to enable new types of music sharing and discovery. It’s the one feature that could potentially set Zune apart from the iPod.
Unfortunately Zune’s wireless music sharing is turning out to be one of those features that seemed better when it was just a rumor. While Zune users will be able share music with friends, there’s a catch (isn’t there always). As Jim noted earlier, recipients of shared songs will only be able to listen to them three times or for three days, whichever comes first. It sort of sounds like a really bad tire warranty.
Zune accomplishes this amazingly stupid feat by wrapping shared music in a proprietary layer of DRM, regardless of what format the original content may be in. If Microsoft’s claims are to be believed, this on-the-fly DRM will be seamless and automatic - which must be some kind of first for Microsoft.
What Microsoft has created is a new form of viral DRM. Zune will intentionally infect your music with the DRM virus before passing it along to one of your friends. After three listens the poor song dies a horrible DRM enabled death. Talk about innovation.
Microsoft will undoubtedly claim this limitation is designed to support artists and prevent piracy. There’s just one problem. Not all artists want their music protected by DRM. Furthermore, not all artists benefit from having their music protected by DRM.
While it may come as a surprise to Microsoft and the major labels, independent musicians frequently promote their music by posting unencrypted mp3 files on their websites in hopes of finding an audience. If Zune is really all about community, as Microsoft claims it is, then it would allow music to spread virally, instead of DRM.
Meanwhile, if you’re a musician who is more concerned with building your audience than you are with restricting access to your creative works, you might consider adopting an appropriate Creative Commons license. Based on the item below it appears that Zune’s viral approach to DRM is in violation of all of Creative Commons licenses. It’ll be interesting to see how long it takes before someone actually challenges Microsoft on this.
http://www.medialoper.com/hot-topics/music/zunes-big-innovation-viral-drm/
Now that Microsoft has released some hard facts about Zune we can finally begin to sort out how much of an impact the product might have on the digital music market. For weeks we’ve been hearing rumors about how Zune’s wireless capabilities will be used to enable new types of music sharing and discovery. It’s the one feature that could potentially set Zune apart from the iPod.
Unfortunately Zune’s wireless music sharing is turning out to be one of those features that seemed better when it was just a rumor. While Zune users will be able share music with friends, there’s a catch (isn’t there always). As Jim noted earlier, recipients of shared songs will only be able to listen to them three times or for three days, whichever comes first. It sort of sounds like a really bad tire warranty.
Zune accomplishes this amazingly stupid feat by wrapping shared music in a proprietary layer of DRM, regardless of what format the original content may be in. If Microsoft’s claims are to be believed, this on-the-fly DRM will be seamless and automatic - which must be some kind of first for Microsoft.
What Microsoft has created is a new form of viral DRM. Zune will intentionally infect your music with the DRM virus before passing it along to one of your friends. After three listens the poor song dies a horrible DRM enabled death. Talk about innovation.
Microsoft will undoubtedly claim this limitation is designed to support artists and prevent piracy. There’s just one problem. Not all artists want their music protected by DRM. Furthermore, not all artists benefit from having their music protected by DRM.
While it may come as a surprise to Microsoft and the major labels, independent musicians frequently promote their music by posting unencrypted mp3 files on their websites in hopes of finding an audience. If Zune is really all about community, as Microsoft claims it is, then it would allow music to spread virally, instead of DRM.
Meanwhile, if you’re a musician who is more concerned with building your audience than you are with restricting access to your creative works, you might consider adopting an appropriate Creative Commons license. Based on the item below it appears that Zune’s viral approach to DRM is in violation of all of Creative Commons licenses. It’ll be interesting to see how long it takes before someone actually challenges Microsoft on this.
What happens if someone tries to protect a CC-licensed work with digital rights management (DRM) tools?
If a person uses DRM tools to restrict any of the rights granted in the license, that person violates the license. All of our licenses prohibit licensees from “distributing the Work with any technological measures that control access or use of the Work in a manner inconsistent with the terms of this License Agreement.”
Creative Commons FAQ
Technorati Tags: DRM, Zune, MicrosoftIf a person uses DRM tools to restrict any of the rights granted in the license, that person violates the license. All of our licenses prohibit licensees from “distributing the Work with any technological measures that control access or use of the Work in a manner inconsistent with the terms of this License Agreement.”
Creative Commons FAQ
http://www.medialoper.com/hot-topics/music/zunes-big-innovation-viral-drm/
Maybe i haven't read the DRM article properly but i don't see a problem.
If everyone could trasfer music with no restriction you might as well bin copyright law.
You would just have a mass of people swapping files who have never bought the majority of the material on the Zune.
Like i said if i have not read or read something wrong then my hands are held high!
If everyone could trasfer music with no restriction you might as well bin copyright law.
You would just have a mass of people swapping files who have never bought the majority of the material on the Zune.
Like i said if i have not read or read something wrong then my hands are held high!
I'm looking forward to seeing the thing in action, because its designed for Vista and the Xbox 360 too. I'm not sure about selling my Vision:M though as I've got a feeling the Zune will suffer a lot of teething problems. I can already see its gui being a bloated bugger too.