• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

*** AMD Radeon R9 290X Reviews Thread ***

Man of Honour
Joined
4 Jul 2008
Posts
26,418
Location
(''\(';.;')/'')
Well lets look at performance per pound.

Use Titan as 100% @ £800, so £8 per 1%

With the 290x just matching performance, you are looking at 100% for £430, so £4.30 per 1%.

So it is twice as cost-effective as Titan. SLAIN!

Indeed it depends on each own users definition of slain. To get titan performance for half the price, I'd too count that as slain.
 
Caporegime
Joined
24 Sep 2008
Posts
38,321
Location
Essex innit!
You owe me a virtual Pint :p

Haha, this could be so butttttttttt I want to see a users bench like Kaapstad and see if there is anything between them.

Regardless of the outcome, I am very impressed with the 290X. I wouldn't be overly happy seeing those temps but AMD have stated it is within the parameters of the card, so that's all good. I couldn't giver a hoot about the power it consumes and I would love to see some water cooled results in the futuremark/valley/heaven threads with the volts unlocked. I am unsure how much is in the tank for overclocking but when we have them under water and voltages working in AB, we will have true readings.

Great card with a great price.
 
Soldato
Joined
2 Jan 2012
Posts
11,932
Location
UK.
Indeed it depends on each own users definition of slain. To get titan performance for half the price, I'd too count that as slain.

The 780 already offers that (For a few months now)..

Plus when overclocked the 780 is faster than the 290X and runs cooler / quieter.

How is the 290X anything but disappointing at £450+? The 780 is already down to £450+

If Nvidia drop the 780 to £400 then AMD will have to drop prices on their launch card.
 
Caporegime
Joined
17 Mar 2012
Posts
47,936
Location
ARC-L1, Stanton System
nvidia have already milked in TITAN sales for 9 months, surprising just how many here on this forum bought one. They're killing TITAN off on their own accord anyway with the 780ti, they already did so slightly with the 780.

It would be a real shame if AMD forced Nvidia to kill off the Titan replacing it with a lesser GPU
 
Permabanned
Joined
18 Oct 2012
Posts
9,784
It would be a real shame if AMD forced Nvidia to kill off the Titan replacing it with a lesser GPU

AMD will never force nvidia to do anything, they've tried pushing nvidia with lower pricing but it hasn't worked, nvidia still rules discrete GPU market.
 
Soldato
Joined
2 Jan 2012
Posts
11,932
Location
UK.
You seem to be in the minority with that opinion.

How is it disappointing, the hell were you expecting?

It loses to the 780 / Titan when overclocked, both of which have been around for a while. It runs hotter, uses more power, has ridiculous temps. Since when was 95c ok?

95C !! Wow.

The price is on par with the 780, except the 780 runs cooler and quieter, uses less power, faster when overclocked.

I don't understand anyone buying this over a 780 unless you're die hard AMD fan.

320w total system power, so yes ^^^^ its fine.



He's best ignored at the moment :p

Yeah let's ignore the sane comments :p Because you know I'm right and have nothing to counter with more like.

95C ! and over 400 watts. Yeah great card.

Hope you guys have LN2 on standby, you will need it for overclocking.
 
Associate
Joined
20 Feb 2012
Posts
562
So has there been any info on the 290? Can we make an estimate as to where its performance will be based on the 290x benchmarks?

I'm itching to upgrade :D
 
Soldato
Joined
24 Sep 2008
Posts
10,448
Location
Edinburgh.
It loses to the 780 / Titan when overclocked, both of which have been around for a while. It runs hotter, uses more power, has ridiculous temps. Since when was 95c ok?

95C !! Wow.

The price is on par with the 780, except the 780 runs cooler and quieter, uses less power, faster when overclocked.

I don't understand anyone buying this over a 780 unless you're die hard AMD fan.

Hadn't realised the temperature of the card was locked at 95c at all times, dayum, what a feature.

I disagree about the die hard AMD fan statement too.
 
Caporegime
Joined
12 Jul 2007
Posts
40,686
Location
United Kingdom
Hadn't realised the temperature of the card was locked at 95c at all times, dayum, what a feature.

That's not correct at all. In quiet mode Gibbo said the card operates around 85-90c and throttles if it goes over 95c. This will be with fan speed at 45% and clocks of 1000/1250 stock.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
21 Sep 2009
Posts
5,249
Location
London
It loses to the 780 / Titan when overclocked, both of which have been around for a while. It runs hotter, uses more power, has ridiculous temps. Since when was 95c ok?

95C !! Wow.

The price is on par with the 780, except the 780 runs cooler and quieter, uses less power, faster when overclocked.

I don't understand anyone buying this over a 780 unless you're die hard AMD fan.



Yeah let's ignore the sane comments :p Because you know I'm right and have nothing to counter with more like.

95C ! and over 400 watts. Yeah great card.

Hope you guys have LN2 on standby, you will need it for overclocking.

You do know these AMD reference coolers are pants don't you? 10/10 for effort, but you are aware that AIB's with custom coolers that run considerably cooler are around the corner right?

I got a release day 7970 that ran up to 85ºc in Furmark on the reference cooler, it's now under water and gets no hotter than 50ºc

You've said all you need to say, cherry picked all the shills reviews, you don't have to repost them ad-nauseum.

i've edited your post for you in my quote as you may of forgotten to write it in green :p
 
Back
Top Bottom