Poll: The EU Referendum: How Will You Vote? (April Poll)

Should the United Kingdom remain a member of the European Union or leave the European Union?

  • Remain a member of the European Union

    Votes: 452 45.0%
  • Leave the European Union

    Votes: 553 55.0%

  • Total voters
    1,005
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

Gux

Gux

Associate
Joined
30 Sep 2009
Posts
463
If we leave the EU there will be no EU to lose the support of. France would be the next to hold a referendum and Germany are not going to hold up all the other poor countries.

For me the financial gain or loss of EU membership doesn't bother me. I would rather be worse off for the rest of my life than live in a system that is heading out of control.

Also at least if we all vote to leave the EU could make a deal with us to stay. They know as well as we know that the EU can not survive without us.

So let me get this straight. According to brexit supporters, the UK has almost no influence in the EU and no-one listen to us or gives a **** about us, yet if we leave, the EU will suddenly fall apart? I am guessing due to the lost influence and guidance the UK provides to the EU? :D

Not to mention, the EU was founded and ran without Britain for decades before we joined. Seemed to have survived fine before we joined :rolleyes:

The EU will only fall apart if the UK leaves and is then given a great deal, thus encouraging other member states to start to leave. Due to this, the UK won't get a great deal and at most the EU will get a wake up call with the UK leaving and will have to start making necessary adjustments, which I am sure they will do to some extent.

P.S There are no sources to my theory, only common sense, which I know 99.5% of brexit supporters seems to lack.

A lot of brexit supporters seem to think the UK is still a world power / empire. Shame the rest of the world does not seem to view us as such (including the EU), other wise we would have never even gotten to this point with the EU.

Fantasy and Real world are two different things my friend. :D
 
Soldato
Joined
14 Oct 2003
Posts
13,450
Location
South Derbyshire
So let me get this straight. According to brexit supporters, the UK has almost no influence in the EU and no-one listen to us or gives a **** about us, yet if we leave, the EU will suddenly fall apart? I am guessing due to the lost influence and guidance the UK provides to the EU? :D

Yep. We have never won a vote in the EU. The EU treats the UK like dirt and a cash cow..
 
Soldato
Joined
10 May 2012
Posts
10,067
Location
Leeds
So let me get this straight. According to brexit supporters, the UK has almost no influence in the EU and no-one listen to us or gives a **** about us, yet if we leave, the EU will suddenly fall apart? I am guessing due to the lost influence and guidance the UK provides to the EU? :D

They're not mutually exclusive statements. The UK has little influence on the EU, they're happy to accept our money but unhappy that they have to actually accept our input.

That doesn't mean that if we left it wouldn't set off a chain reaction and loss of confidence in the EU. It's not really a difficult concept to understand frankly
 

Gux

Gux

Associate
Joined
30 Sep 2009
Posts
463
Yep. We have never won a vote in the EU. The EU treats the UK like dirt and a cash cow..

And once we leave, they still start treating us like royalty and will bend over for us. :D

If things are already as bad as you say, I wonder where we are going to get this better deal from....
 

Gux

Gux

Associate
Joined
30 Sep 2009
Posts
463
They're not mutually exclusive statements. The UK has little influence on the EU, they're happy to accept our money but unhappy that they have to actually accept our input.

That doesn't mean that if we left it wouldn't set off a chain reaction and loss of confidence in the EU. It's not really a difficult concept to understand frankly

It won't set off a chain reaction straight away. Everyone will simply look, see what the UK get out of it and then decided if going at it alone is worth it.

That's why it is in majority member states interest to ensure that the UK gets a s.hit deal. To stop any potential chain reactions you speak of. It's not really a difficult concept to understand frankly.
 
Soldato
Joined
10 May 2012
Posts
10,067
Location
Leeds
It won't set off a chain reaction straight away. Everyone will simply look, see what the UK get out of it and then decided if going at it alone is worth it.

That's why it is in majority member states interest to ensure that the UK gets a s.hit deal. To stop any potential chain reactions you speak of. It's not really a difficult concept to understand frankly.

No, they'll put their economy above that. If the UK gets a "bad deal", then they'll have to accept a bad deal when it comes to trading with the worlds 5th largest economy, which is bad for everyone. They won't do that.
 
Soldato
Joined
13 May 2003
Posts
8,865
One topic not really widely discussed is what happens if we vote to leave but delay triggering Article 50. For instance a leave vote may end in a change of PM. The new PM would be wise to negotiate prior to triggering secession. The reason I say this is because tge 2 year timetable is probably too short for both us and the EU. But extension requires unanimous agreement which will allow small nations to demand concessions which would be politically toxic for the core countries.
Control of the timetable for Article 50 is a tool to be wisely deployed.
 
Caporegime
Joined
19 May 2004
Posts
31,760
Location
Nordfriesland, Germany
One topic not really widely discussed is what happens if we vote to leave but delay triggering Article 50. For instance a leave vote may end in a change of PM. The new PM would be wise to negotiate prior to triggering secession. The reason I say this is because tge 2 year timetable is probably too short for both us and the EU. But extension requires unanimous agreement which will allow small nations to demand concessions which would be politically toxic for the core countries.
Control of the timetable for Article 50 is a tool to be wisely deployed.

Cameron has said he will invoke Article 50 the day after the referendum should we vote to Leave. I think this is the correct approach as I expect the EU to simply refuse to negotiate our leaving until we do.

The 2 year timetable is ominous on paper but providing we negotiate in good faith I think there is little reason to think we wouldn't get an extension.
 
Suspended
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
9,479
Why on earth do you think that military power is the be-all and end-all of power? How do you imagine we would influence trade decisions in the EU with an aircraft carrier? How do you imagine that we could influence regulatory changes in China with an extra wing of Tornado bombers? How do you imagine that we will persuade Argentina to lift a block on air flights to the Falklands with an extra platoon of infantry? How do you imagine we're going to negotiate with Russia or the US with any of this?

The idea that a bigger military will suddenly make us able to get what we want in the world is utterly infantile.

What is infantile is the inability to recognise that a strong and capable military is not only essential in the modern World in and of itself, but is an essential component of being taken seriously politically. An iron fist inside a velvet glove. As true in antiquity as it is today.

What is also infantile is the inability to recognise that we are perfectly capable of negotiating politically; that ability doesn't disappear if we leave the EU.

Be less hysterical. If that's possible.
 
Soldato
Joined
13 Nov 2013
Posts
4,294
What is infantile is the inability to recognise that a strong and capable military is not only essential in the modern World in and of itself, but is an essential component of being taken seriously politically. An iron fist inside a velvet glove. As true in antiquity as it is today.

What is also infantile is the inability to recognise that we are perfectly capable of negotiating politically; that ability doesn't disappear if we leave the EU.

Be less hysterical. If that's possible.

Lol. There's only one iron fist in the world right now, it's called the US and it leads an alliance called NATO which consists of Britain along with most other EU members.. Keep dreaming about the antiquity, total war games or whatever it is that you use to form your ridiculous arguments. :D
 

Gux

Gux

Associate
Joined
30 Sep 2009
Posts
463
No, they'll put their economy above that. If the UK gets a "bad deal", then they'll have to accept a bad deal when it comes to trading with the worlds 5th largest economy, which is bad for everyone. They won't do that.

Yeah exactly, they will put their economies first. A chain reaction from the UK leaving, breaking up the EU / Euro would have a FAR bigger and worse effect on their economies than having a worse trade deal with one country....

Spin it anyway you want my friend, a break up of the EU / Euro is a worst case scenario for all member states. As another poster said, UK leaving could cause a chain reaction of the break up of the union. They will do everything possible to discourage the break up and the most effective way of doing this is by giving the UK a bad deal and showing everyone else, that going alone is a mistake.

Precisely because they are concerned about their economies, they will never give us a good deal. A better deal for the UK outside EU, is the end of their of the union and the destruction of their economies.

Its either small economic hurt (giving UK a bad deal) or a potential catastrophic collapse of the EU / Euro and their economies. If it comes down to this choice (and highly likely it will) then they will screw the UK and not the EU & themselves.
 
Man of Honour
Joined
17 Oct 2002
Posts
159,805
No, they'll put their economy above that. If the UK gets a "bad deal", then they'll have to accept a bad deal when it comes to trading with the worlds 5th largest economy, which is bad for everyone. They won't do that.

Where is the EU's good deal when trading with the worlds 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th largest economies then? Where is the tariff free trade with Japan?

We buy lots from Japan, Japan buy lots from us.. yet we levy tariffs and so do they...
 

Gux

Gux

Associate
Joined
30 Sep 2009
Posts
463
[TW]Fox;29439546 said:
Where is the EU's good deal when trading with the worlds 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th largest economies then? Where is the tariff free trade with Japan?

We buy lots from Japan, Japan buy lots from us.. yet we levy tariffs and so do they...

A lot of people are living in a bubble. They are proud of their country and in effect because of that put to high of an importance, thinking we are in the centre of the universe.

A lot of people will be in for a shock if we do leave. It will be a rude awakening of where our neighbours rate us in terms of importance.
 
Don
Joined
7 Aug 2003
Posts
44,357
Location
Aberdeenshire
But they will cut off their nose, if it prevents the collapse of the EU / Euro. Do you honestly think that member states will chose UK over their union and their economies?
Why do you think having a bad trade deal with the UK will save the EU economy? Trade deals are mutually beneficial, it's the whole point of them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom