Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
I suppose something had to give with AMDs run of positive news.![]()
AMD are very irrelevant for the majority of us on this forum sadly now.
A full release of Vega and Zen in q1 2017 makes more sense than a limited stock launch in q4 2016 which would just annoy those who want it, create ill feeling, and lose any momentum their marketing has built up.
I'm going with the Computex 2017 rumour that was floating around 6 weeks ago or so....
Looks like Vega might be battling Volta and not Pascal then![]()
Nothing new here. They had Vega for 2017 a few months ago.
Was only wishful thinking that it might come earlier.
AMD are very irrelevant for the majority of us on this forum sadly now.
That's what I'm seeing![]()
Which means might sell the Nano, because the 1080 is going to stay.
And EK & OCUK going to make few hundred pounds on my quest to keep the 1080 bellow the throttling 42C mark all way to 2200 overclock....
(hahaha)
I think, though, that Vega will likely fill the void between the 1070 and 1080 on both price and performance. Which for some people, can make all the difference when trying to justify costs.
If they do a dual GPU, it will be a niche product, as these things usually are.I think Polaris dual GPU will launch in late 2016 ,which Roy said it would be surprise.
I think, though, that Vega will likely fill the void between the 1070 and 1080 on both price and performance. Which for some people, can make all the difference when trying to justify costs.
If they do a dual GPU, it will be a niche product, as these things usually are.
Most people rightfully dont value multi-GPU very much.
I also have no idea who 'Roy' is.