Inflation and corresponding wage inflation is balancing some of that out.If 4-5 became the norm then house prices would have to drop to a new norm too. Rates will come down before people accept that.
Inflation and corresponding wage inflation is balancing some of that out.If 4-5 became the norm then house prices would have to drop to a new norm too. Rates will come down before people accept that.
Unfortunately, a lack of supply means there is always going to be long term upwards pressure on housing.
Those 2-3% mortgages we signed up to were stress tested against 6-7% rates as part of the lending criteria. You wouldn’t have got the mortgage is you couldn’t afford 4-5%.
As above, the housing market is generally buoyant at the moment and transactions have returned to more normal levels. People are financing them as they were previously.
You have to prove bank statements and your pay slips. You can’t ’just lie’ like you could back in the day.Well, unless people lied, which of course no one would do...
Is the market buoyant price wise? I would suggest that its largely stagnant. Fundamentally as long as people can just afford it now, they will be happy to buy a house as rates will drop a bit and prices simply won't crash. There simply isn't enough building happening to put pressure on house prices.
With same lender yes.They’ll likely do a desktop valuation when you apply for your re-mortgage and they should communicate that to you.
You’ll benefit from the increase in value on the LTV calculation.
The key thing to remember is.... nobody knows what will happen.No way?
I feel like explaining this concept to some people is like the regular savers being half the headline rate
-Ours has just updated periodically on the mortgage app. It's pretty much consistently been about 20% lower than Zooplas valuation. Which is fair enough.They’ll likely do a desktop valuation when you apply for your re-mortgage and they should communicate that to you.
You’ll benefit from the increase in value on the LTV calculation.
Kind of the opposite. People who couldn't see past the maths of calculating the interest over a year. Even if the max they could save was equal to the max pay-in.I missed that, I'm guessing there was some confusion about how to quickly calculate the interest earned over the year if the full value is saved each month?
Dont take the pee. Even MSE explains it this way, the maths works out whichever way you do it.Kind of the opposite. People who couldn't see past the maths of calculating the interest over a year. Even if the max they could save was equal to the max pay-in.
You'll earn what looks like half the headline interest rate
On regular savings, the interest you get will be about half the interest rate of the account. But don't worry, it's not a con – it's just how the maths works out. It's all down to the money being saved monthly rather than in one lump sum.