OcUK Cinebench R15 benchmark thread

[Martini1991]

If you ran it as a 6 core 6 thread, it'd still have better results, but it's moot given its price.

 

[gpuerrilla]

6 Core Intel @ 4.9Ghz = 1248
8 Core AMD @ 4.9Ghz = 769

70% faster with 2 fewer cores....How depressing.

3930 (6 core) ~ £400
4770k ~ £250
FX8350 ~ £150
FX8320 ~ £110

If you ran it as a 6 core 6 thread, it'd still have better results, but it's moot given its price.

£250 difference between them (as martini highlighted). Here, I'l grab your coat for you...

 

[Martini1991]

The 3930K is more like 290 quid difference, which is what we're talking about.

 

[teppic]

It's the 3930K at 4.9GHz being quoted, not the 4770K, which is £450-£500.

 

[gpuerrilla]

Edited whilst you posted as I was searching it's price. That processor alone cost near enough GinG's full rig!!

 

[teppic]

It looks like the 8320 at 5GHz gives 790. The 4770K at 4.4GHz is 822. That's a fair comparison given the cores on the AMD processors aren't as 'full' as the Intel cores.

 

[PCZ]

AMD market the 83xx chips as eight core not 4 core.
Bearing that in mind the performance is awful.

It is not surprising though as there are only 4 FPU units.

 

[Martini1991]

For all intents and purposes, it is an 8 core CPU.

 

[wazza300]

my ib setup

 

[teppic]

AMD market the 83xx chips as eight core not 4 core.
Bearing that in mind the performance is awful.

It is not surprising though as there are only 4 FPU units.

The 4770K overclocked is 4% faster than the 8320 overclocked in this benchmark, with both running all cores. How does that make performance awful?

 

[Martini1991]

The 4770K overclocked is 4% faster than the 8320 overclocked in this benchmark, with both running all cores. How does that make performance awful?

1.) You've chosen a better than average FX8320.
2.) You've chosen a fairly lower clocked i7 4770K.
3.) You're ignoring the 3770K result Wazza just posted.
4.) For an 8 core it's pretty pitiful performance, the performance level maxed out it gives is fast, but for an 8 core? It's not (As it's besting a 4 core 4 threaded chip by about 10%, I can get 717 on a 4670K at 4.75GHZ) which is hopefully how PCZ meant it (Having owned one)

 

[teppic]

1.) You've chosen a better than average FX8320.
2.) You've chosen a fairly lower clocked i7 4770K.
3.) You're ignoring the 3770K result Wazza just posted.
4.) For an 8 core it's pretty pitiful performance, the performance level maxed out it gives is fast, but for an 8 core? It's not, which is hopefully how PCZ meant it (Having owned one)

Oh here we go yet again.

Lots of people can reach 5GHz with adequate cooling.

I've had 4 4770Ks, and only one has managed over 4.4GHz stable (4.5GHz, it can't do 4.6) on expensive boards even at 1.35v.

I'm not ignoring any results, I'm talking about a 4770K at 4.4GHz, which is what the benchmark uses.

You can't speak on behalf of others.

 

[Martini1991]

Not getting into this again, I've said my bit.

 

[teppic]

Not getting into this again, I've said my bit.

For once you could maybe just not say your bit instead of trying to argue day in day out.

 

[uksoldierboy]

My 24/7 overclock score:

4770K @4.6

 

[Martini1991]

The 4.4GHZ result looks VERY low compared to that 4.6GHZ one.

 

[stulid]

Ignore the reported Vcore from CPU-Z, its not reading correctly and there is a newer version to fix it in the works.

 

[uksoldierboy]

I thought the same tbh,

Maybe down to different memory speeds? Lower cache multi? Mine is @44.

 

[uksoldierboy]

Stu got the same issue with mine on cpu-z, scared me the first time I noticed it lol.

 

[Martini1991]

I can't see what can make that sort of difference.