Samsung F4 2TB Drive any good ?

Associate
Joined
16 Sep 2010
Posts
10
I can confirm the Samsung F4 works perfectly in my Synology DS209.

Currently copied just over 40GB of data to it and along with it being nice and quiet (can only just hear seek noise very faintly) it has remained at a cool 28 degrees C so the fan in my NAS is barely spinning :)

It worked straight away with Disk Station Manager 2.3 and I updated to DSM 3.0 Beta and that's working fine as well.

Thats really cool will get 2 on monday, so I am more calm now :D Thanks
 
Associate
Joined
19 Sep 2005
Posts
921
no problem hifreak

I'm interested in getting this but wondering why is this 5400rpm instead of 7200rpm?

By running at 5400rpm it runs quieter and uses less energy.
Generally speaking a 5400rpm drive will be slightly slower than a 7200rpm drive however if you look at people's benchmarks you will see it is not a lot slower than a spinpoint F3 and is on par with some other manufacturers 7200rpm drives.
 
Associate
Joined
14 Jan 2010
Posts
662
no problem hifreak



By running at 5400rpm it runs quieter and uses less energy.
Generally speaking a 5400rpm drive will be slightly slower than a 7200rpm drive however if you look at people's benchmarks you will see it is not a lot slower than a spinpoint F3 and is on par with some other manufacturers 7200rpm drives.

Brilliant. Shall be ordering one then. Thanks.
 
Associate
Joined
16 Sep 2009
Posts
2,199
Location
Loogabarooga
I can confirm the Samsung F4 works perfectly in my Synology DS209.

Currently copied just over 40GB of data to it and along with it being nice and quiet (can only just hear seek noise very faintly) it has remained at a cool 28 degrees C so the fan in my NAS is barely spinning :)

It worked straight away with Disk Station Manager 2.3 and I updated to DSM 3.0 Beta and that's working fine as well.

Brave decision to go with f4's in your NAS. I just purchased a DS710+ but decided to go with a pair of 2TB f3's instead as they are tested by Synology.
 
Associate
Joined
16 Sep 2009
Posts
2,199
Location
Loogabarooga
what is the price difference?

they looked the same to me

If you are talking about the hard drive's themselves then there's only a couple of pounds difference (at this moment in time). I suppose sellers will start discounting the f3's once they get more f4's in stock so they can clear old stock out.
 
Soldato
Joined
7 Sep 2008
Posts
5,589
If you are talking about the hard drive's themselves then there's only a couple of pounds difference (at this moment in time). I suppose sellers will start discounting the f3's once they get more f4's in stock so they can clear old stock out.


damn I don't know how long I can hold on for

I've seen the new F4 for around £75 on some retailers. that's a good price imo
I might wait until the F3 price drops

any ideas how long it will take?
 
Associate
Joined
14 Jan 2010
Posts
662
I'm confused, can someone explain to me in layman's terms about the sector size and alignment? From what my understanding, it is a 4k but reports to the OS as 512 bytes?

I'm on Windows 7 and the F4 will only be used as a storage drive.
 
Soldato
Joined
20 Oct 2008
Posts
12,096
Googling '4k sectors' should find plently of articles explaining things.

As you're running Windows 7 you haven't got anything to worry about as the OS will align things correctly.
 
Soldato
Joined
4 Jan 2004
Posts
20,803
Location
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Googling '4k sectors' should find plently of articles explaining things.

As you're running Windows 7 you haven't got anything to worry about as the OS will align things correctly.
Google does turn up quite a bit of info on 4k sectors, thanks.

Do you know if OSX and Linux cope with 4k sectors ok also?

I'm planning to split my drive into 4 partitions, split between W7, Linux and OSX, and was wondering if I had to do anything special in order to achieve full performance?
 
Associate
Joined
14 Jan 2010
Posts
662
Somethings wrong with one of my F4s:



Or are they meant to slow down like that with stuff put on them?

I noticed the same on mine as well.

Using CrystaDisklMark, I get:
SEQ: 116.1 106.3
512Kb: 23.13 48.59
4K: 0.447 0.909

When I was copy files over to my fresh F4 getting 106mb per sec, now I'm getting anything from 17mb to 90mb. Is that normal? That is a significant drop.
 
Soldato
Joined
20 Oct 2008
Posts
12,096
I'd assume that the benchmark needs to use free areas of the drive for its tests (it would overwrite useful data otherwise).

I’d also assume that user data gets written to the fastest areas of the drive first.

If the above it true then you’ll get an apparent reduction in the benchmark speeds because the fastest area of the drive is in use and no longer available for benchmarking.
 
Associate
Joined
27 Sep 2007
Posts
367
Anybody bought this drive for backup purposes? I need some more space but they'll sit in the drawer for most of the time with me backing up to a few times a month.
 
Associate
Joined
16 Nov 2005
Posts
2,303
Location
Northamptonshire
I've been waiting for a 4K 2TB drive at this sort of price for 6 months or more and now I'm not so sure since it would be the OS drive for Win7 and its handy to be able to boot into XP, run WinDirStat etc and see all the files without any ownership issues.
 
Back
Top Bottom