I went round on a single Titan @1175/1802 and scored 81.5 fps
_Alatar_ was using 1346/1925
If we just stick to the core speed to start with
81.5 / 1175 = 0.0694 x 1346 = 93.361 fps
If you then factor in the higher memory speed _Alatar_ was using and the slightly more efficient Haswell 4770k that will bring the score up to what he got - 95.8 fps.
Did you actually get 93.361 fps or are you just adding up?
15% higher clock = 15% higher score does not add up to me, clock scaling is never that linear.
Your 81 FPS @ 1175 on your Titan is the same as Tommy on his 290X @ 1175, and yet Avenged7Fold only got 86 @ 1300Mhz also on a 290X and a faster Haswell CPU. while Greg only got 84 on his 1300Mhz Titan.
So 100% clock to score scaling doesn't happen, it never does.
All those add up. Alatar's does not, not even close.
His FPS in all 3 aspects are way higher than anyone, in double digests, it should be marginal if anything.
Its just not making sense to me.
It's a game benchmark. It's a bit of fun not a competition.
The simple answer is they were ran on different drivers and different set-ups. Because of that no comparison can be made. Alatar got what he did and the others got what they did. That's why these threads exist to compare what different users are getting on different PCs. I really fail to see the problem.
Unless you sit there and debug the drivers he's using and the game the answer you seek cannot be found.
I can't just add anything, if its not right. its not fair on others.