New low? Sony edits Halo 3 Wikipedia entry
- Thread starter Abooie
- Start date
Bingo. Sheer stupidity.
![[TR]SweetSpotOz](/styles/overclockers/avatars/6.png){kind=avatar}
Soldato
- Joined
- 5 Mar 2006
- Posts
- 6,183
- Location
- everywhere
God because no one ever gets refused promotion and so takes an anonymous, public stab at their own company.
Eh?
Haha, remember that site sony got busted for, it looked like a kid starting a campaign for a psp for christmas saying how great it was but it was just sony marketing and they got busted after only a day or two. Then they used the pgr3 image not once but twice! and now this...
See, now people are mistaken. In an earlier thread there were people blaming Xbox360 failure rates on Bill Gates etc..
The difference here is that it actually does fall under Sony's fault for this. As an employee of SCEE he is expected to act professionally etc.. Without going into the long drawn out reasonings, SCEE are indirectly responsible due to one mans stupidity.
The difference here is that it actually does fall under Sony's fault for this. As an employee of SCEE he is expected to act professionally etc.. Without going into the long drawn out reasonings, SCEE are indirectly responsible due to one mans stupidity.
Thrice actually.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 9 Mar 2006
- Posts
- 58,607
- Location
- Surrey
wasn't the third time a different company though? i believe it wasn't actually related to Sony, I could be wrong though.
The sony fangirls would scream bloody murder.
Ah yes, an employee of Bungie? Microsoft? with access to a SCEE owned computer?
I suggest reading the thread
Can anyone prove it wasnt a cleaner, or someone who doesnt actually work officially for Sony (a guest at a meeting for example) - We have internet pc's that use our gateway that arent actually on our network (have no network resources etc)
Think its not much of anything - and people on here just want to jump down the throats of something "obvious" which quite blatently couldnt be "officially" Sony (or any other company doing this kind of "editing")
No way in the world you can be sure it was a direct employee
Would put a completely different spin on the story IF it was actually an MS employee (or an affilliate) who somehow managed to get access to a free internet terminal at Sony - a shared publisher for example - and did the editing (admittedly unlikely but just as improbable as an actual Sony employee doing it)
Think its not much of anything - and people on here just want to jump down the throats of something "obvious" which quite blatently couldnt be "officially" Sony (or any other company doing this kind of "editing")
No way in the world you can be sure it was a direct employee
Would put a completely different spin on the story IF it was actually an MS employee (or an affilliate) who somehow managed to get access to a free internet terminal at Sony - a shared publisher for example - and did the editing (admittedly unlikely but just as improbable as an actual Sony employee doing it)
Last edited:
Wonder why when Microsoft was caught editing the Wiki entry about the 360 failures, slating Apple and offering people money to change there wiki articles about Microsoft no one bothered posting? Is this any less crass than the PS3 launch when Microsoft employees went around handing out Xbox chairs to people waiting in line or having a barge sale past the TV cameras with Xbox live Posters all over it at the Paris launch party. That was quite amusing in a way, sad but quite funny bit like the Wiki entry.