he was asked to stop talking. obviously the guy being asked the question was in parliament and of some authority so more extensive measures are taken.
how would you like it if you were having a candle lit dinner with the missus for i dunno.. an anniversary and he turns up asking ''you gunna nail her tonight, i would ect ect ect. you'd ask him to stop and what if he doesnt? i know i would tasar him if i had one or i'd just beat the **** out of him. not right. but there is a time and a place to air your views.
that was not one of them.
Are you an idiot? Its a video filmed at a public discussion, they've even set up a microphone with speakers for people to ask questions and air their views.
From whats shown in the video that is completely over the top, and as far as i was aware when legally arresting someone you had to inform them of the reason and read them their rights.
He was asking a question which was presumably okay as Kelly (the guy on stage) was heard saying a couple of times, "its okay, i'll answer his question" and the female officer who had been talking with other officers in the background while the guy was speaking told her colleague to arrest him. For what reason he was arrested i'm unsure of, the conspiracy style content of what he was saying i guess. Either way, the female officer went against kelly's instructions and proceeded to detain him immediately with the intent of removing him from the room which appears to be completely of her own decision.
They proceeded to grab him and muttered something quickly at him which looks to be "your under arrest" he refused arrest and said "i'm not going" and shook them off him before he was read any rights and upon shaking them off he just stood there with his arms in the air. Maybe he should have waited to hear why he was being arrested before shaking them off but then they didn't look like they were going to do it peacefully. He gets a taser pointed at him at which point he's just standing there and turns to walk out the room and even begins to do so as the officers then proceed to grab him and the large black officer plows him out the room quite effectively while he's shouting "where are you taking me?" and "what did i do?" Which implies he wasn't told why he's been arrested still. The fact he's not doing anything other than standing there and walking out briefly as one of the officers is holding his wrists seems to imply he simply didn't like them fully restraining him.
He then makes a break for the stage presumably to get into the limelight again. Maybe he was worried they'd treat him unfairly and wanted the room of witnesses and camcorders (which he succeeeded in doing) to see what happened. Maybe he wanted to run at Kelly and strangle him or something... who knows.
The only thing clearly visible is that the only things the woman officer would tell him were to "quieten down" and "do it now". Good reasons for arresting someone and equal to readin him his rights? I don't think so.
The other thing thats clearly shown in the video is the fact he's told to lie on his stomach and only at the mention of the taser does he turn around to speak to the person threatening him, going against his ultimatum. With the way he reacted in front of the taser earlier it would seem he was quite worried by them. What is also clearly shown is that at the exact moment he's tasered he's sat still with one hand being held and the other on a chair and he's still in this position up until the point he gets tasered.
I'd say it was handled very inapropriately by the police and although they seemed to be completely unsure of what to do and looked to be panicking (the female "lead" officer kept looking around her almost worriedly while he was being pinned down and very sheepishly put her hand on his shoulder to "contribute" to restraining him) he didn't help the situation with going against everything they told him to do.
Its not a clear case of him being a **** and deserving it, they acted very unprofessionally and didn't do it "by the book".