Where did I say the Golf GTI is "very interesting". If you weren't so engrossed in starting arguments you'd have noticed I made it quite clear that I was speaking "from the general public's" point of view. I don't know *anybody* that would prefer to see a 330Ci on screen rather than a Golf GTI. It's just simple - I don't see how you can't "get" that
Let me just pause to take in the irony for a second.
Aaah.
Thats better. Right. You didn't say it, but you implied it by what you said. The fact you justified the chocie of car by laying into the 330 as 'the most boring car ever' implies you don't think the same of the VW Golf. I mean just look at what you said to make your point. What on earth has the magazine cover reference got to do with anything? TG Magazine and Evo are hardly adorned with VW Golfs either, are they?
And lets face it, this arguement is saving the thread becuase it was otherwise a worthless, pointless, stupid thread devoid of any discussional merit
In Summary:
a) TG chose a Golf becuase it's a useful benchmark as most peoples idea of a 'quick car'
b) The Golf was a good choice as a result
c) Chosing a 330Ci would have been daft as it's not a current production car.
d) A 330Ci is not a boring car unless compared directly to something like a Lambo. But in such circumstances, an FWD Golf is perhaps even more boring
e) If you are going to make sweeping generalisations, at least make them half-way fathomable. Calling 3 litre RWD Coupes more boring than anything that Perodua have produced just sounds stupid.