Your random pictures..

Status
Not open for further replies.
I want some!

051011_kissobajs_kartong.jpg
 
Lysander said:
If you're referring to the 'jailbait' pictures I don't see what was unsuitable about them. As for anything else, I can't comment since I missed the last one or two pics that got deleted.
Click to expand...

Sorry - come again - you don't see anything wrong with posting underrage girls in their underwear? To me they smack on innapropriate and definately the sort of thing that I'd issue a warning over. It's an extraordinarily poor show of thought to put that kind of stuff up.

The simple fact that it is a photo of a young girl with a 'jail bait' caption smacks of ill intention. Seems pretty clear to me.
 
SteveOBHave said:
Sorry - come again - you don't see anything wrong with posting underrage girls in their underwear?
Click to expand...

Well no, especially seeing as all of those girls were in their teens and most of them looked about 16. You'll see girls of that age in their underwear in the Next or Littlewoods catalogue. However, if someone posted such a photo here, a few members would RTM it for being "unsuitable".

These days a lot of people seem to be on a hair trigger and you can't post a picture without someone going "you can't do that!! It's wrong" through pandering to knee-jerk consensus. Fortunately there are still a few of us who can think for ourselves and judge things on their own merits without a] making comments aimed at garnering support from similar-minded unthinking forum members or b] thinking something is unwholesome because they believe they should.
 
Last edited:
Lysander said:
Well no, especially seeing as all of those girls were in their teens and most of them looked about 16. You'll see girls of that age in their underwear in the Next or Littlewoods catalogue. However, if someone posted such a photo here, a few members would RTM it for being "unsuitable".

These days a lot of people seem to be on a hair trigger and you can't post a picture without someone going "you can't do that!! It's wrong" through pandering to knee-jerk consensus. Fortunately there are still a few of us who can think for ourselves and judge things on their own merits without a] making comments aimed at garnering support from similar-minded unthinking forum members or b] thinking something is unwholesome because they believe they should.
Click to expand...

Typical 'free thinker', anyone who doesn't agree with them is mindless cattle.

Loving your brave new world there.
 
Lysander said:
Well no, especially seeing as all of those girls were in their teens and most of them looked about 16. You'll see girls of that age in their underwear in the Next or Littlewoods catalogue. However, if someone posted such a photo here, a few members would RTM it for being "unsuitable".
Click to expand...

Yeah but in a Next or Littlewoods catalogue they aren't in the context of phwoooor Jail Bait!!!! - Sorry my friend, I can't see the angle.

These days a lot of people seem to be on a hair trigger and you can't post a picture without someone going "you can't do that!! It's wrong" through pandering to knee-jerk consensus. Fortunately there are still a few of us who can think for ourselves and judge things on their own merits without a] making comments aimed at garnering support from similar-minded unthinking forum members or b] thinking something is unwholesome because they believe they should.
Click to expand...

Conversely do you think that just because CP is thinly veiled as humor it should be acceptable. You appear to have a very large grey area for the appropriate/inappropriate line.
 
SteveOBHave said:
Yeah but in a Next or Littlewoods catalogue they aren't in the context of phwoooor Jail Bait!!!! - Sorry my friend, I can't see the angle.



Conversely do you think that just because CP is thinly veiled as humor it should be acceptable. You appear to have a very large grey area for the appropriate/inappropriate line.
Click to expand...

normalinternetseriousbuxe4.jpg


Must.Not.Laugh.At.Things.On.Internet
 
I agree with lysander

Some of the ppl on this forum will be looking at girls the same age as them and those girls are prob older than some members :p

It is *************, to say what is appropriate and unappropriate. Some of the images on here are unappropriate (take the convo between a guy and a ummm guy/girl). People need to relax a little. (if the mods think they are unsuitable then fair enough take them down)

Edit : If the girls were young they wouldnt be posing like that
 
It's not so much the pictures in isolation (although some did appear way too young) but three pages of joking about sex with minors.

One or two pics is one thing, but when you get to three pages your starting a trend, a trend I don't think OcUK wants to be associated with.
 
Telescopi said:
One or two pics is one thing, but when you get to three pages your starting a trend, a trend I don't think OcUK wants to be associated with.
Click to expand...
Would I be out of line saying that this action gives the impression that OcUK seems to have no problem being associated with discrimination against blacks and muslims? I mean, we saw rapid action against the "jailbait" pictures but there's more anti-muslim and blacks with watermelons pictures than you can shake a stick at.

This is why I brought this up earlier, if we're going to start deleting pictures that aren't PC then the rest need to go too because this thread (in fact this forum, and Speaker's Corner) is chock-a-block with stuff just as offensive as "jailbait" pictures to some people.

Alternatively it could just be left alone since most of it has a funny side.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom