. I was thinking that 170bhp from a 2 litre diesel was good.
From the little research I've done, the 120D can easily be chipped to 200bhp putting it on par with a petrol Golf GTI.
[TW]Fox;10160903 said:Nowhere near as thrilling and interesting though.
From the little research I've done, the 120D can easily be chipped to 200bhp putting it on par with a petrol Golf GTI.
[TW]Fox;10161113 said:The handling is about the only thing the 1 Series does really well. I couldn't see myself driving 30k miles a year in a 1 Series - infact I decided I couldn't be bothered with a 300 mile trip I was going to make when I had a 116i for the week. Went the next week instead.
[TW]Fox;10161509 said:118d M Sport and 120d M Sport - very, very joggly ride on dual carriageways and Motorways. Seriously grated me after 20 miles let alone 700. It wasn't the fact it was firm, but the fact it was firm and bouncy as well. It skipped over imperfections in the carriageway. And had no cruise, but I guess thats an option.
[TW]Fox;10161584 said:You want an Intravee - it's in development and it's a little pricey but it works SO well. It will give you total Ipod control via your OEM stereo screen. You will, unfortunately, lose your CD changer as it uses the same port on the stereo.
Thats all fair and well but a Golf GTI can be remapped to around 270bhp with over 300lbft, diesel torque over double the revs and petrol power. Won't do diesel MPG though however should be in the 30s. (The ED30 Golfs are remappable to over 310bhp and 300lbft) Its not really fair comparing a remapped car to standard car.
I would however take the 135i over the 123d, I've still to see a performance diesel match its quoted MPG in the real world. I bet on the normal tank full the 123d driven on my normal route will be in the low 40s high 30s certainly good for its performance but not enough to move me away from a petrol.
My 06 118D manages well over 50 MPG - Which is over the quoted MPG figure.
Most BMW figures are conservative - not optimistic!