Could someone check this car for me

[TW]Fox;10281453 said:
Thats becuase you buy little towncars that are fit for the bin after 73k miles of crashing over speedbumps, negotiating potholes and having trolleys rammed into them in Tesco.

:confused: You talk such crap. My car has no dings and the person before me used it for the daily commute to work which was 20-30 miles a day out of town, so Im not sure where you pulled that from.
 
:confused: You talk such crap. My car has no dings and the person before me used it for the daily commute to work which was 20-30 miles a day, so Im not sure where you pulled that from.

I'm going by your opinion that 73k miles is too much for you. I gave the only scenario in which 73k miles feels like a lot of miles.
 
Maybe my opinion would change if I had owned a high mileage car but I generally thought that more things could go wrong with a high mileage car than a low mileage car. But when you put it into perspective a low mileage car may have been owned by a town go-er so there is every possibility these may be even worse. Hmmm something to ponder on.
 
I think we should judge cars on engine hours instead of mileage becuase the notion that a car that drove for 1 hour and covered 80 miles has suffered 4 times the wear of a car that drove for 1 hour around town and covered 20 miles is stupid.
 
[TW]Fox;10281648 said:
I think we should judge cars on engine hours instead of mileage becuase the notion that a car that drove for 1 hour and covered 80 miles has suffered 4 times the wear of a car that drove for 1 hour around town and covered 20 miles is stupid.

The stupid thing is is that this is how the majority of machinery life is measured. Why cars are different i am not sure. Makes sense to me that it should be done in hours.
 
Back
Top Bottom