Oh the irony
[TW]Fox;10285233 said:I'd wager at least half of the 3 Series drivers on the road neither know, nor care, quite how good their car is. It said BMW on the back, so they bought it. Sad fact unfortunately.
I think the whole 'Ultimate Driving Machine' mantra is unduly overhyped. British car magazines buy into that hype hook, line and sinker.
Having driven the 320i with normal suspenion, I fail to see how a car can be satisfying to drive when it basically bounces and crashes from one road imperfection to the next.
Granted, roads in Kenya are worse than most, but even on the recently (and smoothly) surfaced highways, you are always fighting with the unnecessarily heavy steering to keep the car going straight.
My Subaru Outback has a far, far superior ride and even if it rolls a bit more in corners, the payback in ride quality far outweighs any agility the BMW may have. You can't even exploit that agility, because hit a bump mid corner and whole car jumps to the left or right, and picking up speed only serves to exacerbate all the faults mentioned above.
I love cars but I think this blind pursuit to offer the best handling is wasted on the vast majority of the car buying public, who are interested in comfortable transport from point A to B. That's why Mercedes sales in Kenya absolutely trounce BMW.
It's very true that nothing else can comes comes in terms of fluidity and the sheer way it flows like a BMW can.
Sorry but you're 18.
It's a pretty facile statement as the Porsche 911 is better than every generation of 3 series. As is every V8 Ferrari, as is the Mitsubishi Evo, and the Subaru Impreza. Every car produced by Lotus, Noble, Caterham, TVR are better drivers cars.
Every generation of MX5 is a better drive, loads of Golfs were better. What you are really saying is that a few BMW range toppers were pretty good cars compared to a load of other mediocre stuff churned out by volume manufacturers like Peugeot, Citroen, Renault, Ford, Nissan and Vauxhall....
When I was 18 nothing else came close to the fluidity of my Mk 3 Escort.
i agree think i would rather have loads of other cars rather than a below m3 3 series and would have a rs4 over a m3 as well
It's a pretty facile statement as the Porsche 911 is better than every generation of 3 series. As is every V8 Ferrari, as is the Mitsubishi Evo, and the Subaru Impreza. Every car produced by Lotus, Noble, Caterham, TVR are better drivers cars.
Every generation of MX5 is a better drive, loads of Golfs were better.
[TW]Fox;10284948 said:You are almost certainly right - for pure driving enjoyment, as a drivers car, nothing in its class beats the 3 Series which is usually why RS audi's get shown up by the M3.
Lots of people will disagree with you though, most of which having never driven a 3 Series.
Whats perhaps more of a question is... does this really matter?
But still, this is OcUK. So, a car celeberated every where as being the drivers choice and available with a range of some the best engines the world has ever seen (I wonder if any car other than a 3 Series has had more Engine of the Year powerplants in it) will be derided as crap and boring, based on the fact that:
a) They dont have one
b) Everyone who does is a **** anyway
c) Everyone in their road has a shabby E36
d) Golfs and stuff are interesting, RWD 6 pots are not
But then this forum is obsessed with image. This is a forum who would say a Ferrari F430 is crap and boring if Ferrari sold 100,000 of them next year. This forum is able to erase and forget every talent a car has and judge it purely on how it looks and how many they see each day.