So being a mere female who can only think about shoes
Could someone explain the fascination with watches? surely they only need to tell the time? we have 3 threads running at the moment, all on watches which cost so much more than shoes....?

I've no idea what it is with watches. Especially not the vast majority of ones that are showed off on here, they all look awful, in my opinion. Overly complicated, more bells and whistles then you know what to do with and..ridiculously overpriced.
Don't people just collect them like china dolls? I'd be scared to wear a 5k watch on the wrist and go out of the house. 1 scratch and it'll be very expensive accident.
I wear all my watches for varous things, I went down the local last night in a 7+ grand watch
its the same as fast cars, why buy a super car for £200,000 when a nissan micra will do the same job in about the same time (traffic, speed laws etc)
[TW]Fox;10295523 said:The difference between a £50 and a £5000 watch is NOT the same
Do you have a picture of the watch? Did you wear a gold chain as well?![]()
But they both tell the time.... maybe the Casio would lose a second's accuracy per month over the other but it's negligible..
Pick up a cheapo radio-controlled digital watch for £30 and it's uber-accurateBut they both tell the time.... maybe the Casio would lose a second's accuracy per month over the other but it's negligible..
But they both tell the time.... maybe the Casio would lose a second's accuracy per month over the other but it's negligible..
the Casio is likely to be more accurate
Don't forget effect of conspicuous consumption as well! The 'power of the label'!