Associate
- Joined
- 26 Sep 2006
- Posts
- 1,945
- Location
- West Bridgford
Hi all
I was installing an socket 939 X2 CPU (3800 as it happens, from a single core 4000) on a mates PC, and we were testing it with Oblivion (as you do
) and I noticed that he had been running it 800 x 600! I was like "Why are you running it at such a low resolution" and he said "because that is the only way I can have smooth gameplay".
Now baring in mind that he has an X1800XT with 512MB of vram on it, shouldn't he be getting much better fps? Whilst I don't have the exact numbers, walking around outside must have been 20-30 at 1024 x 768, as it did seem pretty choppy. I would have said average detail settings were medium - high, shadows turned off, no mods.
Your thoughts...
Spec:
AMD X2 3800 @ 2GHz
X1800XT 512MB
2GB of RAM (possibly 1GB, I didn't look too closely)
1 sata hard disk
Asus motherboard (exact model escapes me)
I was installing an socket 939 X2 CPU (3800 as it happens, from a single core 4000) on a mates PC, and we were testing it with Oblivion (as you do

Now baring in mind that he has an X1800XT with 512MB of vram on it, shouldn't he be getting much better fps? Whilst I don't have the exact numbers, walking around outside must have been 20-30 at 1024 x 768, as it did seem pretty choppy. I would have said average detail settings were medium - high, shadows turned off, no mods.
Your thoughts...
Spec:
AMD X2 3800 @ 2GHz
X1800XT 512MB
2GB of RAM (possibly 1GB, I didn't look too closely)
1 sata hard disk
Asus motherboard (exact model escapes me)