2meg vs 3.2meg camera or 6500 classic vs 6500 slider

Chabsy

Chabsy

Chabsy

Associate
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
1,092
Location
UK
I really like the 6500 classic and sort of like the 6500 slider

If the classic came with a 3.2 camera then there would be no contest. But it dont. will i really miss the 1.2meg?

Also the slider aint on T mobile and the classic is.

What to do.
 
The only thing to consider is do you use the camera a lot? I've had a K800i for over a year now, the real reason I got it last year was because of the camera. Thought i'd wanna use it a lot.

But to be honest, I ain't really used the camera a lot. So, do you see yourself using the camera a lot? :)
 
Chabsy said:
I really like the 6500 classic and sort of like the 6500 slider

If the classic came with a 3.2 camera then there would be no contest. But it dont. will i really miss the 1.2meg?

Also the slider aint on T mobile and the classic is.

What to do.
Click to expand...

Not only do you lose 1.2mp, but you also lose auto-focus.
 
Chabsy said:
I really like the 6500 classic and sort of like the 6500 slider

If the classic came with a 3.2 camera then there would be no contest. But it dont. will i really miss the 1.2meg?

Also the slider aint on T mobile and the classic is.

What to do.
Click to expand...

If you use the camera a lot you won't like the one on the classic. I bought a classic yesterday and the camera really is poor.

I however do not use the camera and I love it compared to my old brick of a phone (N95)
 
The 6500 is a very nice phone. Just get it and make do with the camera imo. If you want to take serious photographs, 3.2 on current tech won't cut it either.
 
I do use the camera a fair bit, ive also got a canon ixus but its quicker just to use the phone and i cant charge the camera on the move but i can charge the phone cam, i only take picture of houses most of what i take only needs to look ok at 1024 x 768. My SE k800 take reasonable pics at 3.2
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom